U.S. has avoided direct confrontation with Russia due to nuclear threats, says Blinken

The United States successfully addressed the potential threat of nuclear weapon use by Russia without engaging in direct conflict, as stated by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken during an interview with The New York Times.

In his discussion with reporters, Blinken addressed inquiries regarding the proximity of the US to direct confrontation with Russia during its extensive invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

“There have been various instances where we had significant concerns about possible actions from Russia, including the potential use of nuclear weapons. This certainly sharpened our focus. However, I believe we have managed to steer clear of direct conflict with Russia throughout this period,” Blinken remarked.

The Secretary of State emphasized that Russia is currently involved in a range of malicious activities, including hybrid attacks such as cyber operations, sabotage, and assassination attempts.

“These actions are occurring, particularly in Europe. We are collaborating closely with many of our allies on these issues. While I don’t believe we have been on the brink of direct conflict, it is a situation we must remain acutely aware of,” he concluded, stressing the importance of vigilance in Washington’s approach.

On bolstering Ukraine in anticipation of a significant Russian offensive

In discussing U.S. assistance to Ukraine, Blinken emphasized the commitment to ensure readiness not only on our part but also among our allies and partners, as well as Ukraine itself, in preparation for Russia’s large-scale aggression.

Blinken disclosed that prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, efforts began as early as September 2021 and continued into December to discreetly supply Ukraine with a substantial amount of weaponry, ensuring they had the necessary resources for self-defense.

He noted, “Weapons such as Stingers and Javelins played a crucial role in thwarting Russia’s attempts to capture Kyiv, overrun the nation, and effectively erase it from existence, ultimately pushing Russian forces back.”

Furthermore, he mentioned that at various intervals, discussions arose regarding the provision of additional military equipment to Ukraine.

“Should we supply Abrams tanks? What about F-16s? Each time, we had to consider not only whether to provide these assets to Ukraine but also if they had the capability to operate and maintain them. Is it part of a comprehensive strategy? All these factors influenced our decisions regarding what to supply and the timing of those supplies,” Blinken elaborated.

The potential for concluding the conflict through diplomatic channels was a key topic of discussion

He highlighted the diplomatic initiatives aimed at supporting Ukraine in 2022, emphasizing the coalition of over 50 nations, extending beyond Europe, that rallied in defense of Ukraine and the principles under threat from Russia since February of that year.

He noted the extensive efforts made prior to the onset of the war, including discussions with the Russian Foreign Minister in Geneva, aimed at averting military aggression from the Kremlin against Ukraine.

“Had there been any viable diplomatic avenues to achieve a just and lasting resolution to the war, we would have eagerly pursued them. Regrettably, up to this point, we have not observed any indication that Russia is genuinely willing to engage in such discussions. I remain hopeful that this will change,” Blinken remarked.

Earlier, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken indicated that significant changes to the front line in Ukraine are unlikely. He asserted that the decision to conclude the war ultimately rests with the Ukrainian people.