India and China have finalized an agreement to resolve a military standoff at their contested border, occurring four years after a violent confrontation in the western Himalayas severely strained their relations.

Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stated in an interview on Monday that the accord regarding border patrols indicates that “the disengagement process with China has been completed.”

Although the broader border dispute remains unresolved, this agreement facilitates the resumption of patrols in the Ladakh region by both nations’ forces, enabling them to assert their territorial claims while ensuring compliance with the terms established in the recent agreement.

The announcement coincided with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi‘s upcoming visit to Kazan, Russia, for the BRICS summit, which will also include participation from China.

Analysts suggest that this pact could enhance political and economic relations between the two Asian powers and may pave the way for a potential meeting between Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping, marking their first encounter since 2020.

What does the agreement entail?

The specifics of the agreement remain undisclosed, with limited information available.

Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri indicated that the purpose of the pact is to facilitate the “disengagement” of military forces at the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which delineates the territories controlled by China and India. The LAC extends from Ladakh in the west to Arunachal Pradesh in the east, with parts of the latter also claimed by China, covering a total distance of 3,488 km (2,167 miles). As implied by its name, the LAC marks the division of areas under physical control rather than territorial claims.

Misri did not clarify whether the agreement would lead to the withdrawal of the tens of thousands of additional troops that both nations have deployed in the Ladakh region.

On Tuesday, China acknowledged the agreement concerning military patrols along the border but did not specify if it pertains to the entire length of the border or only to specific areas that have experienced conflicts.

A senior military official informed Reuters that both countries would slightly withdraw their forces from their current positions to prevent confrontations, while still being permitted to conduct patrols based on a schedule that is currently being developed. He also mentioned that monthly review meetings and ongoing monitoring of the disputed regions by both nations would help ensure compliance and prevent violations.

Manoj Joshi, an analyst with the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, informed Al Jazeera that the limited information released by officials indicates that negotiations might still be in progress.

He stated, “If a formal agreement exists and is made public, we could gain a better understanding of the forthcoming developments.”

Several questions persist, particularly regarding the status of the “buffer” zones established along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which both parties are expected to refrain from patrolling, he noted.

How did they arrive at this situation?

For the past seventy years, India and China have been embroiled in a border dispute.

The conflict escalated into a brief but intense war in 1962, resulting in a significant defeat for India and the loss of territory in Aksai Chin, located in the far northeast of Ladakh. This area has since remained a contentious issue between the two nations.

Following a series of border agreements in the 1990s, diplomatic relations improved. The agreements of 1993 and 1996 are often seen as pivotal moments, as they established a framework that allowed both countries to avoid casualties along the border for over fifty years after the 1962 conflict. However, this arrangement has faced increasing strain in recent times.

Incidents involving their troops occurred in 2013, 2014—during Xi’s visit to India—and again in 2017. In 2019, India’s repeal of Article 370, which had granted a degree of autonomy to Indian-administered Kashmir, including the disputed regions of Ladakh, was perceived by China as a unilateral alteration of territorial status. This prompted a strong denunciation from China at the United Nations Security Council.

The clash in 2020, which resulted in fatalities, marked a critical low point in their relationship.

Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington, DC, remarked that while this week’s agreement is noteworthy, its significance should not be exaggerated.

“It does not resolve the border dispute,” Kugelman stated in an interview with Al Jazeera. “This is an agreement that will facilitate a return to the status quo in Ladakh prior to the crisis.”

Kugelman noted that there seems to be no indication of troop withdrawal in the regions where mobilizations occurred during the Ladakh crisis. He emphasized the need for caution regarding this new agreement.

Key moments in the India-China relationship since 2020 include:

June 2020: The Galwan Valley witnessed deadly clashes resulting in the deaths of twenty Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers, marking the first fatalities in nearly six decades. This incident sparked significant outrage and protests in India, raising international concerns as the UN called for both nations to exercise maximum restraint. In response, India imposed restrictions on Chinese investments, banned numerous popular Chinese mobile applications, including TikTok, and halted direct flights, with the total number of banned apps eventually reaching 321.

January 2021: A “minor face-off” occurred between Indian and Chinese soldiers along the border in Sikkim, as described by the Indian army.

December 2022: Minor skirmishes erupted in the Tawang sector of Arunachal Pradesh, an area also claimed by China. Beijing accused Indian forces of hindering a routine patrol, while New Delhi asserted that Chinese troops had encroached on Indian territory and attempted to alter the status quo.

August 2023: During a brief meeting at the BRICS summit in Johannesburg, Modi and Xi agreed to enhance efforts for disengagement and de-escalation.

In June, Jaishankar engaged with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi during the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Kazakhstan, where they reached an agreement to enhance discussions aimed at resolving border issues.

By September, Jaishankar indicated that approximately 75 percent of the “disengagement” challenges at the India-China border had been addressed.

What is the broader context of this agreement?

While a conclusive resolution to the China-India border dispute remains out of reach, both nations are expressing a willingness to initiate a new chapter in their relations.

Kugelman noted that the two nuclear nations have been in dialogue regarding the border situation since the 2020 clash.

“The question arises: Why announce the agreement at this time?” Kugelman remarked. “The upcoming BRICS summit is a significant factor here.”

The timing of the agreement, just before the BRICS summit commenced on Tuesday, provides India with “the diplomatic opportunity for a meeting between Modi and Xi during the summit,” according to the analyst. “From a political standpoint, it is more feasible for New Delhi to consent to such a meeting in light of the border agreement.”

Economic relations likely served as a crucial motivator. China has consistently been one of India’s top two trading partners, alongside the United States. In 2023 and 2024, it emerged as India’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $118.4 billion.

Beijing continues to be India’s primary source of goods and its foremost supplier of industrial products, ranging from telecommunications equipment to raw materials for the pharmaceutical sector.

Reducing tensions is also advantageous for China as it seeks to enhance its global influence through multilateral platforms, including BRICS. Many Chinese firms, which faced challenges operating in India after 2020 due to stricter investment regulations and the banning of popular Chinese applications, are eager for a revival of relations.

Joshi, from the Observer Research Foundation and author of Understanding the India–China Border, highlighted that pressure from the Indian business sector contributed to the achievement of the border agreement.

Following the events of 2020, India implemented stringent restrictions on Chinese investments and visa applications, he noted. He mentioned that there was significant pressure from India to reset bilateral relations.

The analyst further explained that although the relationship had been marked by a lack of mutual trust, the recent agreement indicated that the approach of diplomatic engagement with China has yielded positive results.

“Trust was compromised in 2020. This represents a fresh start, offering a chance to return to a period when the relationship was more stable,” he remarked.

However, Kugelman expressed a more reserved perspective. “I do not believe this agreement signals the beginning of a broader reconciliation, primarily due to ongoing tensions stemming from geopolitical rivalries,” he stated, highlighting issues such as China’s increasing naval activities in the Indian Ocean, its close ties with Pakistan, and India’s strong partnership with the United States.

“This agreement serves as a confidence-building measure, which is beneficial for relations that have deteriorated in recent years,” Kugelman added, “but it should not be interpreted as the initial step towards normalizing the relationship.”