U.S. Plot to Topple Modi? Inside the BJP’s Explosive Conspiracy Claims

In recent weeks, a provocative narrative has emerged from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-aligned influencers, alleging that the United States, led by President Donald Trump, is orchestrating a covert effort to destabilize and remove Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. These claims, steeped in geopolitical intrigue, have sparked debates about India’s foreign relations, domestic politics, and the role of social media in shaping public perception. But how much truth lies behind these accusations, and what are the broader implications for India and its global standing?

According to posts on X from accounts like @AugadhBhudeva and @deepdownanlyz, the U.S. is leveraging its intelligence apparatus, including the CIA and the so-called “Deep State,” to undermine Modi’s government. The supposed triggers include Modi’s refusal to meet Trump after an operation dubbed “Op Sindoor,” India’s rejection of a U.S. free trade deal, and its decision to halt purchases of American weapons. Adding fuel to the narrative, influencers point to India’s deepening ties with Russia—highlighted by Modi’s public remarks about his “friendship” with Vladimir Putin—as a source of U.S. ire, especially after Trump imposed tariffs on Indian goods in 2025.

A key incident cited is a reportedly tense 35-minute phone call between Modi and Trump on June 17, 2025, which allegedly bruised Trump’s ego. Some posts claim the U.S. is now activating decades-old influence networks to amplify domestic opposition to Modi, portraying him as a weak leader to erode his public support. These narratives also hint at regional dynamics, with some suggesting U.S. collaboration with Pakistan’s military leadership to destabilize India.

While these allegations are compelling, they lack corroboration from credible sources. No official statements from either the Indian or U.S. governments substantiate claims of a regime change operation. References to “Op Sindoor” or specific diplomatic slights remain vague and unverified, suggesting they may be speculative or exaggerated for political effect. The absence of concrete evidence raises questions about the reliability of these X-driven narratives.

However, the claims do reflect real geopolitical tensions. U.S.-India relations have faced challenges under Trump’s administration, particularly over trade disputes. India’s refusal to align fully with U.S. interests, coupled with its strategic partnerships with Russia, could strain bilateral ties. Modi’s high-profile engagements with Putin, including summits in 2025, underscore India’s “multi-alignment” foreign policy, which prioritizes strategic autonomy over Western alignment. Trump’s tariffs on Indian goods further highlight economic friction, but equating these to a deliberate plot to oust Modi stretches credulity without substantiation.

The BJP has long leveraged its robust digital ecosystem to shape narratives and rally supporters. By framing the U.S. as an adversary, influencers may be seeking to bolster Modi’s image as a steadfast leader resisting foreign interference. This aligns with the party’s strategy of using nationalist rhetoric to unify its base, particularly Hindu nationalists, while deflecting criticism on domestic issues like unemployment, inflation, or infrastructure challenges. Portraying opposition parties as pawns of foreign powers further amplifies this narrative, casting Modi as a defender of Indian sovereignty.

Domestic Impact: These claims risk deepening India’s already polarized political landscape. By amplifying a narrative of foreign interference, the BJP could galvanize its supporters but also alienate moderates who view such rhetoric as divisive. If opposition parties are branded as U.S. proxies, it could stifle legitimate policy debates, framing dissent as unpatriotic. Moreover, the focus on external threats may distract from pressing domestic challenges, such as economic recovery or climate resilience, which have been sidelined in recent BJP campaigns.

International Ramifications: If these allegations gain traction, they could strain U.S.-India relations at a time when both nations navigate complex trade and security dynamics. India’s balancing act between the U.S., Russia, and other powers is central to its foreign policy, and public accusations of U.S. meddling could complicate diplomatic efforts. Additionally, linking these claims to Pakistan risks escalating regional tensions, particularly given India’s sensitive border dynamics.

Disinformation Risks: The reliance on unverified X posts underscores the broader challenge of disinformation in India’s hyper-connected digital sphere. With millions of users on platforms like X, narratives can spread rapidly, shaping public opinion before facts are verified. This highlights the need for critical media literacy to counter speculative claims that could erode trust in institutions and international partnerships.

The claims of a U.S. plot to remove PM Modi, while gripping, appear to be a mix of geopolitical speculation and political strategy. They tap into real tensions in U.S.-India relations but lack the evidence to support accusations of a coordinated regime change effort. For the BJP, these narratives serve as a tool to rally domestic support and deflect criticism, but they risk fueling polarization and diplomatic friction.

As India navigates its role on the global stage, distinguishing fact from rhetoric will be crucial to maintaining its strategic and domestic stability. For those seeking clarity, cross-referencing primary sources or official statements is essential. Until verifiable evidence emerges, these claims remain a provocative but unsubstantiated chapter in India’s political discourse.