India’s External Affairs Minister Visits France to Repair Ties Strained by Alleged Rafale “Performance” Issues ??

India’s External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, is set to embark on a significant diplomatic mission in France this week, a strategic visit that astute defense analysts view as an urgent effort to recalibrate a crucial partnership that has recently been strained by contentious allegations regarding the advanced French-made Rafale fighter jet.

This high-stakes diplomatic endeavor highlights growing geopolitical concerns and the rapid reassessment of global military technology, especially in the increasingly unstable Indo-Pacific region. In addition to the formal meetings at the Élysée Palace, the Indian foreign minister’s European agenda includes important stops in Belgium and Germany, indicating a broader, coordinated effort to strengthen New Delhi’s relationships with key European capitals amid rising regional and global uncertainties.

#News | External Affairs Minister @DrSJaishankar embarks on a 7-day official visit to France, the EU, and Belgium.
In France, he will hold key bilateral talks with French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot in Paris and Marseille, strengthening strategic ties and global… pic.twitter.com/GJN98Hgcnk

— DD News (@DDNewslive) June 8, 2025

A recent statement from the Indian Ministry of External Affairs, while framed in typical diplomatic niceties, provided a subtle insight into the underlying tensions: “Our relationship with France is founded on deep trust and strong commitment, where both nations collaborate closely across all areas of strategic and current significance, in addition to sharing similar perspectives on various regional and global matters.”

Nevertheless, this facade of diplomatic friendliness conceals a significant and rapidly expanding rift that directly arises from the intense India-Pakistan aerial confrontations of early May 2025, during which Islamabad boldly asserted that its Chinese-made Chengdu J-10C multi-role fighter jets successfully engaged and downed six Indian Air Force (IAF) aircraft, including an astonishing three Rafale fighters.

If these extraordinary claims by Pakistan are definitively verified, it would represent a pivotal and unprecedented moment in modern air combat, marking the first alleged combat losses of the highly acclaimed Rafale platform, a jet that has been extensively promoted for its superior multi-role capabilities and combat history.

Importantly, these contentious assertions from Pakistan were allegedly supported by intelligence evaluations from both American and French sources, which adds a troubling level of credibility to the claims, despite New Delhi’s steadfast denial. India’s persistent refusal to recognize any losses of Rafale aircraft, even amidst growing external validation and increasing analyses of satellite imagery, has sparked allegations of a calculated “cover-up” concerning the operational effectiveness of its esteemed French-manufactured combat jets.

The escalating debate has inevitably infiltrated India’s strong domestic political landscape, with a notable state minister and former Indian Air Force pilot, N. Uttam Reddy, openly urging Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s central government to demonstrate greater transparency about the purported shoot-downs, especially those related to the sensitive Rafale aircraft. Reddy, who holds the position of Minister of Irrigation and Public Supply in Telangana state, sharply criticized the Modi administration’s perceived lack of clarity, asserting: “We celebrate the safe return of Indian Air Force pilots after they successfully completed their missions.” He went on to deliver a significant political critique, stating, “However, the central government must clarify the reports suggesting that one of the country’s fighter jets was downed.” Reddy, a prominent member of India’s powerful opposition Congress party, further insisted at a prominent press conference in New Delhi, “The government must also reveal the number of Pakistani fighter jets that were successfully brought down.

Adding another layer of unsettling complexity to India’s meticulously curated narrative, General Anil Chauhan, the Chief of Defence Staff of India, recently made an unprecedented acknowledgment during an interview with Bloomberg in Singapore. He confirmed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) had indeed experienced aircraft losses in the recent aerial conflict with Pakistan, although he notably avoided disclosing the precise number or types of aircraft involved. This represented the first public admission of aerial combat losses by a senior Indian military official since the Pulwama incident.

However, the intentional omission of specific details continues to incite intense speculation and global scrutiny. General Chauhan, addressing the esteemed Shangri-La Dialogue, strategically shifted focus from the immediate combat results to a broader, more significant strategic issue, stating: “What is important is not whether the fighter jet went down, but why it went down.” While this remark may have been aimed at diverting attention from the reported losses, it inadvertently heightened existing concerns regarding the operational performance of the Rafale and the overall combat readiness of the IAF.

The already fragile strategic relationship between New Delhi and Paris is believed to have significantly worsened following ongoing reports that India allegedly declined a crucial request from Dassault Aviation, the esteemed manufacturer of the Rafale, to send an independent audit team to evaluate IAF Rafale aircraft in light of the post-conflict allegations. This unprecedented refusal by the Indian government to allow Dassault’s audit team has created palpable waves of concern throughout the global defense community, raising serious questions about transparency, accountability, and the fundamental trust dynamics within essential bilateral defense partnerships.

Intelligence assessments from a coalition of global sources, thoroughly validated by comprehensive open-source defense evaluations, consistently suggest that Dassault Aviation had indeed dispatched a specialized technical team to India with the clear and urgent aim of probing potential systemic weaknesses in the Rafale platform that could have led to the reported asset losses. Nevertheless, India is said to have denied this specialized team full access to the IAF’s frontline Rafale squadrons, sparking intense speculation among international defense circles that New Delhi is actively trying to conceal deeper, more systemic internal issues related to operational readiness, maintenance practices, and overall pilot competency standards.

The perceived reluctance arises from India’s supposed fear that Dassault Aviation might, during its assessment, link any identified Rafale performance issues not to the aircraft’s fundamental design or manufacturing, but instead to significant systemic failures within the IAF itself, including urgent concerns such as ongoing pilot shortages and chronic, long-standing maintenance delays. These underlying fears are indeed justified: a critical audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), submitted to the Parliamentary Defence Committee months before the recent conflict, meticulously highlighted a severe deficit of 596 pilots within the IAF, a troubling figure that marks a notable increase from 486 in 2015. Efforts to train an anticipated 222 new pilots each year between 2016 and 2021 reportedly fell drastically short, worsening a serious human resource shortfall within India’s intricate air defense system and threatening future operational readiness.

Compounding this complex crisis, the IAF’s essential foundation for basic pilot training, the Swiss-manufactured Pilatus PC-7 Mk-II aircraft, has suffered from significant and recurring serviceability problems for several years, further hindering the steady and effective training of new aviators.

Additionally, the contentious Agnipath recruitment initiative, aimed at modernizing India’s armed forces, has brought about new uncertainties concerning the long-term retention of seasoned personnel and the development of combat-ready aviators, which could worsen the existing pilot shortage.

At the exact moment the conflict began, India had only 31 active fighter squadrons, which is critically below the minimum of 42 squadrons considered absolutely necessary by its own defense doctrine for a credible two-front deterrence strategy against both China and Pakistan. French officials are understandably expressing significant concern over the evolving situation, believing that the highly capable Rafale is being unfairly blamed for what they see as India’s broader, underlying structural military deficiencies, especially given the aircraft’s clearly demonstrated combat effectiveness in other challenging environments, including those in the Middle East and Libya, when properly integrated, meticulously maintained, and expertly operated. Nevertheless, this strategic deadlock is clearly not a one-sided issue; India, having long felt the strategic strain, has consistently raised public complaints regarding Dassault’s unwavering reluctance to grant full, unrestricted access to the Rafale’s highly sensitive avionics system source code – a deeply contentious matter that has lingered since the landmark US$8.7 billion purchase agreement was concluded in 2016.

Without this absolutely essential source code, Indian defense engineers are fundamentally unable to independently update software, seamlessly integrate indigenous weapon systems, or perform deep-level maintenance and future upgrades on the aircraft’s vital mission-critical systems. This situation severely impacts the nation’s strategic and operational sovereignty in real-time combat scenarios. This long-standing technical deadlock has now clearly escalated into a significant, geopolitically sensitive strategic liability, starkly highlighting the inherent limitations of external defense procurement without a comprehensive, reciprocal framework for genuine technology transfer and indigenous control.

Indian defense analysts, spanning the political spectrum, are increasingly viewing this as a clear, unmistakable sign that Western defense manufacturers prioritize the stringent protection of their intellectual property and proprietary technologies over ensuring the long-term combat capabilities and strategic autonomy of even their most crucial clients, such as India. Meanwhile, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has not hesitated to opportunistically exploit this perceived vulnerability, using it as a powerful propaganda tool to undermine India’s strategic standing and challenge the perceived superiority of Western military hardware. Following credible reports of India’s recovery of a relatively intact PL-15 missile, allegedly launched by a Pakistani fighter during the recent aerial engagements, China’s assertive “wolf warrior” diplomats took to prominent social media platforms, publicly mocking India’s defense capabilities and emphasizing its technological dependencies.

“India spent US$288 million for each Rafale, but they do not have access to the source code,” a Chinese official provocatively stated on Platform X, highlighting the deep-seated proprietary limitations.

The official further issued a sharp taunt: “They also assert their ability to ‘extract software’ from the remnants of the PL-15, despite their own inability to access the core system of their Rafale jets,” which highlights a perceived hypocrisy in India’s technological aspirations. While undeniably provocative and crafted for maximum rhetorical effect, these pointed remarks from China reveal a growing, uncomfortable truth: Chinese-made weapon systems, especially the advanced PL-15 beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM), are not just competitive but are demonstrating exceptional capabilities, potentially surpassing certain established Western systems in real combat situations. The PL-15, which is believed to have played a role in the alleged downing of Indian Rafale jets, features a miniaturized active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar seeker and employs a dual-pulsed solid-fuel rocket motor, enabling it to reach impressive speeds nearing Mach 5 and engage targets at distances greater than 200 kilometers (although the export variant, PL-15E, sold to Pakistan, reportedly has a range of 145 km). When effectively integrated with the advanced Chengdu J-10C multi-role platform, the PL-15 arguably provides the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) with a crucial “first-shot” advantage and superior kinematics over IAF aircraft, many of which still depend on older, less effective beyond-visual-range missiles like the MICA and early Meteor variants. For India, the deeply embarrassing possibility that its high-priced, top-tier Western Rafale jets could be outperformed by a Chinese-Pakistani system not only causes significant damage to its prestige but also fundamentally undermines its long-standing regional security doctrine and strategic procurement strategies.

For many years, India’s defense acquisition strategy has been firmly rooted in the belief that Western military systems offer a distinct technological advantage over adversaries primarily using Chinese or Russian-origin equipment. However, this deeply held strategic belief is now facing its most challenging, public, and potentially damaging real-world test, with significant implications for future global arms markets and the structure of strategic alliances. Although the alleged Rafale losses remain officially unverified by New Delhi, India’s ongoing, unequivocal refusal to allow an independent, third-party audit by Dassault raises critical questions regarding transparency, the validity of combat claims, and the trust dynamics between a major defense buyer and its long-term supplier. This ongoing issue has moved beyond the traditional boundaries of the military-industrial complex, escalating into a major, politically charged debate within India, as opposition parties revive longstanding accusations of financial misconduct in the Rafale acquisition and call for a thorough, independent performance audit of the aircraft in combat. The Indian Ministry of Defence is now under significant, sustained pressure to fundamentally reevaluate its future defense procurement strategy, carefully considering the tactical advantages of acquiring advanced foreign platforms against the pressing need for true strategic autonomy through strong indigenous production capabilities and genuine, comprehensive technology transfer. On the international stage, the geopolitical consequences are undeniably significant and intricate. For Pakistan, the combat effectiveness clearly demonstrated by its J-10C aircraft, equipped with the powerful PL-15, represents a notable strategic milestone in its ongoing effort to rebalance regional air power dynamics.

For China, the purported success of the PL-15 in combat acts as a significant, real-world endorsement of its swiftly evolving, integrated, and increasingly reliable arms export model, which is particularly attractive to developing countries in search of advanced military capabilities, often without the geopolitical stipulations that are commonly linked to Western systems.

On the other hand, established Western defense manufacturers such as Dassault Aviation are experiencing noticeable reputational harm, which may be exceptionally challenging to address in the long run; the Rafale, once celebrated as an almost unbeatable, top-tier multi-role platform, is now under uncomfortable examination not only from its geopolitical competitors but, more importantly, from its own discerning and increasingly skeptical clients.