Tuesday, April 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 132

Chinese Premier Li Qiang arrived in Pakistan for a four-day bilateral visit

0
PM Shehbaz Sharif greets Chinese Premier Li Qiang as he arrives in Rawalpindi on Oct 14, 2024 on a four-day bilateral visit.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang arrived in Pakistan on Monday for a four-day bilateral visit, during which he will participate in the highly anticipated Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit.

This visit coincides with Pakistan’s preparations to host the 23rd SCO meeting of the Council of the Heads of Government (CHG) on October 15 and 16, under strict security protocols.

In light of the summit, the government has declared a three-day public holiday in Islamabad, leading to the closure of schools and businesses, while significant numbers of police and paramilitary forces have been deployed.

Li’s trip marks the first visit by a Chinese premier to Pakistan in 11 years, the last being by Li Keqiang in May 2013.

Upon his arrival at Rawalpindi’s Noor Khan Airbase, the distinguished Chinese leader was greeted by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and honored with a 21-gun salute. Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar, and other senior government officials were also in attendance.

Shortly after Li’s arrival, Prime Minister Shehbaz expressed his pleasure in welcoming his Chinese counterpart and anticipated a “historic and productive visit.”

“We will assess the progress of ongoing initiatives, particularly the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), while also seeking new opportunities for mutually beneficial collaboration. The Pakistan-China All-Weather Strategic Cooperative Partnership is fundamental to regional stability and prosperity,” he stated on X.

A statement from the Foreign Office indicated that Premier Li is scheduled to meet with President Asif Ali Zardari, as well as engage with parliamentary leaders and senior military officials in the country.

The Foreign Office described the visit of the Chinese official as a reflection of the significance both Pakistan and China place on their “All-Weather Strategic Cooperative Partnership.”

“This visit will provide an opportunity for both parties to reaffirm their mutual support on key issues, promote the high-quality development of CPEC, and enhance regular dialogue on significant regional and global matters,” the statement noted.

Premier Li will be joined by various ministers and senior officials, including representatives from the foreign affairs and commerce ministries, the National Development and Reform Commission, and the China International Development Cooperation Agency, as stated by the Foreign Office.

On Sunday, Tarar informed the media that the Chinese premier might officially launch operations at the $200 million Gwadar International Airport.

Li’s visit follows closely after the suicide bombing on October 6 near Karachi’s Jinnah International Airport, which resulted in the deaths of two Chinese nationals and injuries to 11 others, including another Chinese citizen.

In response to China’s call for a comprehensive investigation into the attack, Prime Minister Shehbaz pledged to personally oversee the inquiry.

On Thursday, China announced its commitment to collaborate with Pakistan to ensure the safety and security of Chinese personnel, projects, and institutions within the country.

As reported by Dawn, a four-member delegation from India, 76 delegates from Russia, 15 representatives from China, a two-member team from Iran, and a four-member delegation from Kyrgyzstan arrived in Islamabad on Sunday.

Additionally, seven delegates from the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) also reached the capital.

India’s Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar, who is set to participate in the summit, has indicated that he will refrain from discussing bilateral relations during his visit, marking the first such engagement in nearly a decade.

China, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan will be represented by their prime ministers, while Iran’s First Vice President, Mohammad Reza Aref, is also set to attend the event.

Additionally, PM Luvsannamsrain Oyun-Erdene from observer state Mongolia and Foreign Minister Rashid Meredov from special guest Turkmenistan will participate in the meeting, as stated by the Foreign Office.

Stage Prepared for SCO

As the current Chair of the CHG, Prime Minister Shehbaz will lead the forthcoming SCO meeting.

Security measures have been implemented, with the Army assigned to safeguard the event, key government facilities, and the Red Zone. Rangers have already been stationed throughout the capital.

Earlier today, the government expressed its pride in hosting the SCO summit, emphasizing its dedication to regional collaboration.

The summit is set to concentrate on strengthening regional cooperation, trade, and financial integrity among member nations, which will significantly enhance Pakistan’s reputation and future opportunities.

By establishing Pakistan as a trade hub for Central Asia, the summit seeks to encourage economic integration, promote a digital economy, and facilitate cultural exchanges, thereby contributing to regional prosperity and stability.

Tarar mentioned that he has assessed the preparations for a facilitation center dedicated to foreign media attending the global summit.

“I am pleased to confirm that all arrangements are finalized to provide comprehensive support and ensure a seamless experience for all participants during the SCO,” he stated in a post on X.

Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz remarked that the objectives of poverty alleviation and economic advancement would be achieved through collaborative efforts, as reported by PTV News.

CM Maryam emphasized that the summit would serve as a transformative event for Pakistan.

Sindh Governor Kamran Tessori expressed optimism that the gathering would create new opportunities for strengthening ties with allied nations.

In an interview with Geo News, PPP Senator Sherry Rehman pointed out that the SCO summit presents Pakistan with a chance to establish itself as a vital connectivity hub amid the evolving landscape of global trade and Middle Eastern relations.

“I believe we are beginning to gain momentum,” she stated.

When questioned about the potential US perspective on the summit, particularly with the presence of competing superpowers China and Russia, Rehman suggested that the US likely does not perceive any significant threat.

“I don’t believe that the SCO or our hosting of it poses a challenge to the US. We maintain a relationship with them as a non-NATO ally, and it’s not a situation where friendship with one nation necessitates hostility towards another,” she explained.

Rehman also pointed out that the US has its own regional alliances, such as the Quad and NATO, and acknowledged the rising influence of Eurasia and Asia as emerging powers, especially regarding economic development.

Philippines doubts China’s commitment to negotiating a code of conduct in South China Sea

0

The Philippines remains skeptical about China‘s commitment to negotiating a regional code of conduct in the South China Sea, despite Manila’s eagerness to continue discussions, according to Defence Minister Gilberto Teodoro on Monday. Teodoro noted that while President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has endorsed “good-faith discussions” with China regarding the long-awaited code, he harbors doubts about Beijing’s genuine intentions. “At this moment, to be frank, I do not perceive that,” Teodoro stated to reporters.

The Chinese embassy in Manila has not yet provided a response to a request for comment. On Sunday, Southeast Asian leaders urged for a prompt agreement on a code of conduct for the South China Sea, emphasizing the need for adherence to international law amid rising tensions in the vital waterway, which facilitates $3 trillion in trade annually. China asserts its claim over nearly the entirety of the South China Sea, which overlaps with claims from Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam.

The Philippines has raised concerns regarding the tactics employed by Chinese vessels, including the use of water cannons, collisions, and ramming, aimed at obstructing resupply and patrol operations in contested waters. A maritime code, proposed as a means to mitigate such confrontations and avert conflict, has been discussed for several years; however, negotiations spearheaded by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations have progressed at a sluggish pace.

Italian naval vessel ITS Alpino arrived at Karachi port

0
Italian naval vessel ITS Alpino

The Italian naval vessel ITS Alpino has arrived at Karachi port. The Italian Carrier Strike Group’s ship, equipped with advanced frigate technology, will be docked in Karachi from October 14 to 16.

Today, the ‘Defense Industry Forum’ is scheduled to take place aboard the ITS Alpino. This event is organized by the General Secretariat of Defense and the National Armaments Directorate, with assistance from the Federation of Italian Companies for Aerospace, Defense, and Security (AIAD).

Additionally, it is anticipated that at 4:40 PM today, the Italian Ambassador to Islamabad, Marilena Ermelin, will provide a briefing during a press conference on the ship ITS Cavour.

Zelenskiy says North Korea moved personnel to Russia for war in Ukraine

0
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy appears at a joint press conference

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy stated on Sunday that the defense partnerships with his country’s allies must adapt in response to North Korea‘s transfer of personnel and weaponry to Russian forces in Ukraine.

The Kremlin, however, rejected South Korean claims made on Thursday that North Korea might have dispatched military personnel to assist Russia in its conflict with Ukraine and could be considering a larger deployment.

Zelenskiy emphasized in his evening video address, “We are witnessing a strengthening alliance between Russia and regimes like North Korea. This situation extends beyond mere weapon transfers; it involves the movement of personnel from North Korea to the occupying forces.” He further noted, “Given these circumstances, it is clear that our relationships with partners must evolve. The front line requires increased support. We are advocating for enhanced long-range capabilities for Ukraine and more consistent supplies for our forces, rather than just a basic inventory of military equipment.”

South Korea’s Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun stated on Tuesday that there is a significant likelihood that North Korea may send troops to assist Russia in its conflict with Ukraine. During a parliamentary session, he also indicated that reports regarding the deaths of North Korean military personnel in a Ukrainian attack on areas held by Russian forces are probably accurate.

In response to inquiries on Thursday about North Korea potentially deploying troops to Ukraine, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the claims, labeling them as “another instance of fake news.”

Taiwan’s senior security official admits pressure by China is significant

0

A senior security official from Taiwan stated on Monday that the pressure exerted by China on Taiwan is significant, following China’s initiation of a new series of military exercises around the island. Speaking at an international forum on Chinese politics in Taipei, National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu emphasized the importance of remaining vigilant. He remarked, “We will adopt a moderate and responsible approach, ensuring the status quo across the Taiwan Strait is maintained.”

China, which considers the democratically governed Taiwan as part of its territory, labels Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te as a “separatist.” In response, Lai and his administration firmly reject Beijing’s claims of sovereignty, asserting that only the people of Taiwan have the authority to determine their future. Wu noted, “Global leaders are increasingly discussing the necessity for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.” He added that Taiwan will persist in exploring avenues for dialogue with China.

During his keynote address on national day last week, Lai asserted that the People’s Republic of China does not have the authority to represent Taiwan. However, he expressed Taiwan’s openness to collaborate with Beijing on pressing issues such as climate change, balancing a strong stance with a conciliatory approach, which provoked anger from China.

Following Lai’s inauguration, China conducted military exercises around Taiwan in May, labeling them as “punishment” for the separatist themes in his speech. Additionally, Chinese military aircraft and naval vessels frequently operate in close proximity to the island.

China’s military starts new series of exercises near Taiwan

0

China’s military commenced a new series of exercises near Taiwan on Monday, characterizing them as a warning against the “separatist actions of Taiwan independence forces.” The military did not specify an end date for these drills, which have drawn criticism from the government in Taipei.

Taiwan, a democratically governed entity that China claims as its own, has been on high alert for additional military exercises following President Lai Ching-te’s national day speech last week. In his address, which Beijing condemned, Lai asserted that China has no authority to represent Taiwan, despite expressing a willingness to engage in cooperation with Beijing.

The Eastern Theatre Command of the Chinese military announced that the “Joint Sword-2024B” exercises are being conducted in the Taiwan Strait and surrounding areas to the north, south, and east of Taiwan. The statement emphasized that the drills serve as a serious warning to the separatist actions of Taiwan independence forces, describing them as a legitimate and necessary measure to protect state sovereignty and national unity.

The command released a map indicating nine designated areas around Taiwan where military drills are being conducted—two located on the eastern coast, three on the western coast, one to the north, and three near Taiwan-controlled islands adjacent to the Chinese coastline.

According to the command, Chinese naval vessels and aircraft are approaching Taiwan from various directions, emphasizing readiness for sea-air combat operations, blockading critical ports and regions, targeting maritime and land objectives, and aiming for a “joint seizure of comprehensive superiority.”

Despite these activities, there was no announcement regarding live-fire exercises or designated no-fly zones. In 2022, following the visit of then-U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan, China launched missiles over the island.

Chinese state media reported that, in unusual operations, the Chinese coast guard has circled Taiwan and conducted “law enforcement” patrols near Taiwan’s offshore islands. The Mainland Affairs Council, responsible for Taiwan’s policy towards China, stated that China’s recent military exercises and its refusal to rule out the use of force represent “blatant provocations” that significantly threaten regional peace and stability.

In light of the escalating political, military, and economic threats from China towards Taiwan in recent days, Taiwan remains resolute, according to a statement from the Mainland Affairs Council, which oversees Taiwan’s China policy.

“President Lai has conveyed his commitment to maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait alongside the Chinese communists in his national day address,” the statement noted.

Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense confirmed that it has mobilized its own military forces.

Lai’s address on national day underscored the current dynamics of cross-strait relations, emphasizing a strong commitment to preserving peace and stability while promoting future collaboration to address challenges such as climate change, the ministry stated.

“The assertion by the Chinese communists of ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’ is entirely unfounded,” it continued.

A senior security official from Taiwan, who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the situation, indicated to Reuters that they suspect China is conducting blockades of Taiwanese ports to the north and south of the island, as well as in international shipping lanes, while also working to deter foreign military presence.

On Sunday, Taiwan reported that a Chinese aircraft carrier group was navigating southward through the Bashi Channel, a crucial waterway that separates Taiwan from the Philippines and links the South China Sea to the Pacific Ocean. Since Thursday, Chinese state media has published a series of articles and commentaries criticizing Lai’s speech, and on Sunday, the Eastern Theatre Command released a video asserting its readiness for combat.

The PLA’s Liberation Army Daily stated on Monday, “Those who play with fire get burned!” It further emphasized that as long as provocations for “Taiwan independence” persist, the PLA’s efforts to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity will continue unabated.

The White House has not yet responded to inquiries regarding the military exercises. Last week, the U.S. indicated that China lacked justification for leveraging Lai’s national day address as a rationale for military intimidation. In May, shortly after Lai assumed office, China conducted the “Joint Sword-2024A” drills for two days around Taiwan, labeling them as “punishment” for the separatist themes in his inauguration speech.

Lai has consistently expressed a willingness to engage in dialogue with China, but his overtures have been met with rejection. He maintains that only the people of Taiwan have the authority to determine their future and firmly opposes Beijing’s claims of sovereignty.

Pentagon to send troops and anti-missile system to Israel

0

The United States announced on Sunday its decision to deploy troops to Israel, accompanied by an advanced anti-missile system, in a rare move aimed at enhancing the nation’s air defense capabilities in response to missile strikes from Iran.

President Joe Biden stated that this action is intended “to defend Israel,” which is contemplating a potential retaliation against Iran following the launch of over 180 missiles at Israel on October 1.

According to officials, the U.S. has been discreetly advising Israel to carefully consider its response to prevent escalating tensions into a wider conflict in the Middle East. Biden has publicly expressed his disapproval of an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities and has raised concerns regarding attacks on Iran’s energy infrastructure.

Pentagon spokesperson Major General Patrick Ryder characterized the deployment as part of “the broader adjustments the U.S. military has implemented in recent months” to support Israel and protect U.S. personnel from threats posed by Iran and its allied groups.

A U.S. military deployment to Israel is uncommon outside of training exercises, primarily due to Israel’s robust military capabilities. In recent months, U.S. forces have supported Israel’s defense from naval vessels and aircraft in the Middle East amid Iranian aggression, although they were stationed outside of Israel.

The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system plays a vital role in the U.S. military’s multi-layered air defense strategy, enhancing Israel’s already strong anti-missile systems.

Typically, a THAAD battery requires approximately 100 personnel for its operation, consisting of six truck-mounted launchers, each equipped with eight interceptors, along with advanced radar technology.

Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araqchi, cautioned on Sunday that the U.S. is endangering its troops by deploying them to manage missile systems in Israel. He stated, “While we have made tremendous efforts in recent days to contain an all-out war in our region, I say it clearly that we have no red lines in defending our people and interests,” via a post on X.

Experts indicate that Iran has been cautious in avoiding direct conflict with the United States, which adds complexity to its strategy regarding the deployment of U.S. forces to Israel. In April, Iran launched missiles and drones targeting Israel, and on October 1, it escalated its actions by firing over 180 ballistic missiles at Israel during heightened tensions with Hezbollah, an Iran-aligned group in Lebanon. While many of these missiles were intercepted, some managed to breach Israel’s missile defense systems.

U.S. officials have not disclosed the timeline for the deployment of defense systems to Israel. The Pentagon noted that a THAAD system was previously deployed to southern Israel for training exercises in 2019, marking its only known presence in the region. Lockheed Martin, the largest U.S. defense contractor, manufactures and integrates the THAAD system, which is engineered to intercept short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, while Raytheon, part of RTX, develops its sophisticated radar technology.

North Korea says border units instructed to shoot amid drones dispute

0
Kim Yo Jong, sister of North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un

North Korea has instructed its artillery units stationed near the South Korean border to be on high alert for potential firing, following tensions related to drone activities that Pyongyang claims are occurring across the border, as reported by state media on Sunday.

In South Korea, some defectors and activists have been sending aid packages and dropping leaflets that criticize Kim Jong Un. North Korea has attributed this practice to the South Korean military and has retaliated by releasing balloons containing waste into South Korea.

According to a spokesperson from North Korea’s defense ministry, as reported by the state news agency KCNA, there is a significant concern regarding the possibility of additional drones entering the capital, prompting the military to prepare for various scenarios, including potential conflict. On Friday, North Korea accused South Korea of deploying drones over Pyongyang during the previous week, asserting that such incursions warranted a response. Kim Yo Jong, the influential sister of Kim Jong Un, issued a warning to Seoul on Saturday, indicating that a “horrible disaster” could ensue.

The responsibility rests with the South Korean military if it did not detect drones dispatched by a non-governmental organization that crossed the border, she stated. Meanwhile, South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff indicated that they could not verify the claims made by North Korea.

UN says Israeli tanks had breached the gates of peacekeeping mission in Lebanon

0

The United Nations reported on Sunday that Israeli tanks had breached the gates of a base belonging to its peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon, marking the latest in a series of allegations regarding violations and assaults that have been condemned even by Israel‘s allies.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged the United Nations to withdraw the UNIFIL peacekeeping troops from combat zones in Lebanon. Shortly thereafter, the peacekeeping force indicated that it had observed further Israeli violations, including tanks entering a base without permission.

“The time has come for you to remove UNIFIL from Hezbollah strongholds and combat areas,” Netanyahu stated in a message directed to U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres. “The IDF has made this request multiple times, only to face repeated refusals, which effectively allows Hezbollah terrorists to use peacekeepers as human shields.”

Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militant group, has rejected Israel’s claims that it exploits the presence of peacekeepers for its own protection.

Five peacekeepers have been injured in a series of recent strikes targeting peacekeeping positions and personnel, with UNIFIL attributing most of the attacks to Israeli forces. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who is usually a strong advocate for Israel among Western European leaders, spoke with Netanyahu on Sunday and condemned the Israeli assaults.

Italy contributes over a thousand troops to the 10,000-strong UNIFIL contingent, making it one of the largest contributors. France and Spain, each providing nearly 700 soldiers, have also expressed their disapproval of the Israeli actions.

The Italian government stated, “Prime Minister Meloni emphasized that attacks on UNIFIL by Israeli armed forces are unacceptable.” Additionally, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz confirmed on Sunday that the country has prohibited U.N. Secretary-General Guterres from entering Israel, citing his perceived failure to sufficiently condemn Iran for a missile attack earlier this month, as well as what Katz characterized as antisemitic and anti-Israel behavior.

UNIFIL was established in 1978 to oversee the situation in southern Lebanon. Since its inception, the region has experienced ongoing conflict, including Israel’s invasion in 1982, which led to an occupation lasting until 2000, and a significant five-week war with Hezbollah in 2006.

The recent Israeli offensive against Hezbollah has resulted in the highest casualties in Lebanon in decades, displacing 1.2 million people and delivering a severe blow to the organization by eliminating a majority of its senior leaders.

Israeli officials contend that UNIFIL has not succeeded in fulfilling its mandate under U.N. Resolution 1701, enacted after the 2006 conflict, which stipulates that the southern Lebanon border area should be devoid of any armed forces or weapons except for those of the Lebanese state.

During a conversation with Israeli Defense Minister Gallant on Saturday, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin expressed significant concern regarding reports of Israeli forces targeting peacekeeper positions and urged Israel to prioritize the safety of both peacekeepers and the Lebanese military, which is not involved in the conflict with Hezbollah.

SECURITY AT RISK

The Israeli military requested that U.N. peacekeepers prepare to move more than 5 kilometers (3 miles) from the border nearly two weeks ago, citing the need to “maintain your safety,” as indicated in a message reviewed by Reuters. U.N. peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix informed the Security Council on Thursday that “the safety and security of peacekeepers is increasingly at risk.” While peacekeepers have remained in their positions, operational activities have largely ceased since September 23, confining them to their bases. Three hundred personnel have been temporarily reassigned to larger bases.

According to a UNIFIL spokesperson, attacks on a watchtower, surveillance cameras, communication systems, and lighting have hindered the monitoring capabilities of the peacekeeping force. U.N. sources expressed concerns that Israeli strikes could obstruct the ability to oversee violations of international law.

The Lebanese government reports that over 2,100 individuals have lost their lives and 10,000 have been injured amid more than a year of conflict, particularly during the recent escalation. This figure does not differentiate between civilians and combatants but includes many women and children.

HIGH ALERT

The Middle East is currently on high alert due to the potential for further escalation following the war ignited by the Iran-backed Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The region is particularly concerned about Israel’s possible retaliation against Iran in response to a missile strike from Iran on October 1, which was a reaction to Israeli operations in Lebanon.

Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araqchi, stated on Sunday that the country has “no red lines” when it comes to self-defense. His remarks seemed aimed at dispelling any notions that Iran would refrain from responding to an Israeli attack, as it did earlier this year after a previous Israeli strike.

According to U.S. officials, Israel has identified specific targets for its potential retaliation against the Iranian missile attack, focusing on military and energy infrastructure, as reported by NBC on Saturday. There are no indications that Israel plans to target nuclear facilities or conduct assassinations within Iran.

The NBC report indicated that an Israeli strike could be imminent, with U.S. and Israeli officials suggesting it might occur during the Jewish Yom Kippur holiday. However, the holiday concluded on Saturday evening without any Israeli action.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, speaking at a press conference in Baghdad alongside Araqchi, warned that a full-scale war could disrupt shipping routes in the region, jeopardize energy exports, and lead to a significant energy crisis.

“We urge all influential and concerned nations to take action to halt the conflict and initiate a ceasefire in Gaza and Lebanon,” Hussein stated.

 

Iran has “no red lines” in defending itself, Foreign Minister says

0

Iran stated on Sunday that it has “no red lines” when it comes to self-defense, as the Middle East remains on high alert for Israel’s potential retaliation following missile attacks from its long-standing adversary two weeks prior.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi’s remarks seemed aimed at countering any notion that Iran would passively accept an Israeli attack without responding, a stance it took earlier this year after Israel targeted Iran following a series of Iranian missile launches.

“Despite our significant efforts in recent days to prevent a full-scale war in our region, I want to make it clear that we have no red lines in protecting our people and interests,” Araqchi stated in a message on X.

On October 1, Iran launched over 180 ballistic missiles at Israel amid heightened tensions with its ally in Lebanon, Hezbollah. While many of the missiles were intercepted, some managed to breach missile defenses, resulting in the death of a Palestinian due to debris that fell in the West Bank.

Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has stated that Israel intends to respond to Iran in a manner that will be “lethal, precise, and surprising.” The situation in the Middle East remains tense as Israel confronts Iran-aligned groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza amid ongoing conflict.

According to NBC, U.S. officials believe that Israel has identified specific targets for its potential retaliation against the recent Iranian missile attacks, focusing on military and energy infrastructure. The report indicated that there are no plans to target nuclear facilities or conduct assassinations within Iran.

The NBC article referenced unnamed U.S. officials and noted that Israel has yet to finalize its strategy regarding the timing and method of its response. Additionally, both U.S. and Israeli officials suggested that a counteraction might occur during the Jewish Yom Kippur holiday, which concluded on Saturday evening without any Israeli military action.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged the United Nations on Sunday to withdraw its peacekeeping troops from combat zones in Lebanon.

Netanyahu stated that the military has repeatedly requested the U.N. to remove the soldiers, asserting that their presence effectively makes them hostages of Hezbollah. Recent days have seen a series of attacks on peacekeeping positions and personnel, with UNIFIL attributing most of these incidents to Israeli forces, which has led to condemnation from the United Nations and various foreign governments. Five peacekeepers have sustained injuries as a result.

Hezbollah has refuted Israel’s claims that it holds the peacekeepers as hostages, arguing that Israel seeks their departure to eliminate oversight of its cross-border operations. U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin conveyed “deep concern” during a conversation with Israeli Defense Minister Gallant on Saturday regarding reports of Israeli fire directed at peacekeeper positions, urging Israel to prioritize the safety of both the peacekeepers and the Lebanese military, which is not involved in the conflict with Hezbollah. Tensions escalated last year when Hezbollah began launching rockets into northern Israel at the onset of the Gaza war, with hostilities intensifying in recent weeks as Israel announced a ground incursion.

Israel’s military has confirmed that it is actively engaged in operations in southern Lebanon aimed at dismantling Hezbollah’s infrastructure.

In the last 24 hours, the Israeli Air Force (IAF) has targeted around 200 Hezbollah positions throughout Lebanon, particularly in the southern region. These strikes have focused on terrorist cells, missile launchers, anti-tank missile sites, and other facilities associated with terrorist activities.

Additionally, the Israeli military reported that five projectiles launched from Lebanon were successfully intercepted by its air force.

In a statement released on Sunday, the military noted that one reservist and an officer sustained serious injuries in two separate combat incidents in southern Lebanon, while other soldiers experienced light to moderate injuries.

Furthermore, the Israeli forces captured a Hezbollah militant in southern Lebanon after uncovering an underground tunnel that led to a cache of weapons and supplies intended for prolonged use.

Hezbollah has claimed responsibility for a rocket attack on the Tirat HaCarmel transport base located in southern Haifa, as stated on Sunday.

According to the Lebanese government, Israel’s intensified military operations have resulted in the displacement of over 1.2 million individuals, with more than 2,100 fatalities and 10,000 injuries reported over the past year of conflict. This casualty figure does not differentiate between civilians and combatants, but it includes a significant number of women and children.

The ongoing conflict in the region has prompted retaliatory actions from various Iran-aligned militant factions, including Yemen’s Houthis and armed groups in Iraq, heightening concerns that the United States and Iran may become embroiled in a broader war.

On Sunday, the Islamic Resistance in Iraq announced it had launched drone strikes against a military installation in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, asserting its support for the Palestinians and Lebanon. The group vowed to intensify its attacks on Israeli positions.

The hostilities in Gaza erupted following a Hamas-led offensive on October 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,200 individuals and the abduction of approximately 250 others, as reported by Israeli sources.

In response, Israel has initiated a military operation in Gaza aimed at dismantling Hamas, which, according to the health ministry in Gaza, has resulted in over 42,000 Palestinian fatalities and extensive destruction across the territory. Israel has been focusing its large-scale military efforts on the northern region of Gaza for more than a week.

Fierce border clashes suggest Israel can’t win the war in Lebanon

0

Last week, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) initiated a ground operation against Hezbollah, a militant group supported by Iran, in southern Lebanon. IDF commanders emphasized that any military engagement would be “limited” in terms of both geographic reach and duration. However, current developments suggest that preparations may be underway for a significantly larger conflict.

On Tuesday, the IDF reported that units from four divisions are actively engaged in combat in southern Lebanon. While the IDF has not disclosed specific troop numbers, it is estimated that each division comprises between 10,000 and 20,000 soldiers. Additionally, Israel has expanded evacuation orders to cover approximately a quarter of Lebanese territory, resulting in over 1.2 million people being displaced, as reported by the United Nations.

Daniel Sobelman, an international security expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, noted that the IDF has deliberately kept the details of the operation ambiguous.

“At first, Israel indicated that the objective was solely to eliminate Hezbollah’s infrastructure directly across the border,” he explained.

“However, it is widely understood that this infrastructure extends far beyond just a few hundred meters or kilometers; it reaches all the way to Beirut, northern Lebanon, and the Beqaa Valley. If Israel intends to thoroughly address the situation in that region, we could be facing a prolonged operation,” he added.

The prospect of a significant ground invasion raises alarms on both sides of the border, where the memories of the previous conflict remain vivid. The 2006 war is referred to in Israel as the “Second Lebanon War,” despite being the third occasion on which Israel officially entered Lebanese territory, following invasions in 1978 and 1982. This conflict concluded in a stalemate after 34 days, resulting in the deaths of approximately 1,100 Lebanese and around 170 Israelis, including 120 soldiers.

For the Lebanese, the ongoing conflict has already resulted in more casualties than the previous war. Since September 16, when Israel intensified its operations against Hezbollah, over 1,500 individuals have lost their lives in Lebanon.

Numerous international organizations have expressed their concerns regarding Israel’s recent escalation of military actions. The United Nations stated last month that “while Hezbollah has launched more missiles indiscriminately, displacing thousands of Israelis from their homes, Israel has intensified its indiscriminate and extensive airstrikes throughout Lebanon,” cautioning that the rising violence “contributes to the instability.”

Although the number of casualties on the Israeli side remains relatively low and primarily involves military personnel, they are still significant: at least 14 IDF soldiers have lost their lives. Additionally, there has been a continuous influx of injured soldiers arriving at the hospital since the commencement of the ground operation, with over 100 treated in just the initial days, according to reports.

Both the IDF and Hezbollah have indicated that there have been intense confrontations and multiple cross-border incidents over the past week.

The level of resistance exhibited by Hezbollah has taken many analysts by surprise, especially considering that Israel has recently eliminated nearly the entire leadership of the Iran-backed organization, including its long-standing leader, Hassan Nasrallah.

Concurrently, Hezbollah persists in launching rockets into Israel on a consistent basis. Although the majority of these projectiles are intercepted by Israeli air defense systems, some do manage to get through. On Wednesday, two Israeli civilians lost their lives when a rocket hit Kiryat Shmona, a town located just a few miles from the border.

Several Israeli soldiers currently engaged in combat in Lebanon have informed U.S. media that the open, mountainous terrain where their adversary operates complicates military operations.

One soldier, who served in Gaza from October to March and again in July and August, and is now deploayed in southern Lebanon, remarked that the conflict along the northern border presents a stark contrast to his experiences in Gaza.

The issue at hand is not that Hezbollah receives superior equipment or training from Iran. Rather, the real challenge lies in the mental adjustment required after months of combat in urban environments compared to operations in open terrain. He emphasized that even fundamental movements, such as the formation of soldiers in a column, differ significantly in these two contexts.

Guerilla Warfare

On paper, the Israeli military possesses a significant advantage over Hezbollah’s militia, boasting more advanced weaponry, a larger troop count, superior intelligence capabilities, and stronger international alliances.

However, a soldier who spoke to the media indicated that these advantages are diminished in the context of the current combat occurring in the hills of southern Lebanon, where the effectiveness of advanced weaponry is less pronounced.

Security expert Sobelman noted that Israel faced a similar situation during the 2006 conflict with Hezbollah.

“Hezbollah confronted the most powerful military in the Middle East, enduring hundreds of Israeli airstrikes daily, along with extensive artillery support and all the resources of a modern military. Yet, they were not defeated. They managed to survive and continued to launch hundreds of rockets into Israel each day throughout the Israeli offensive,” he explained.

Sobelman added that following the setbacks of 2006, Israel has dedicated nearly two decades to preparing for its next engagement with Hezbollah.

The prevailing belief has been that the next conflict would involve Hezbollah rather than Hamas. Few could have anticipated the events of October 7. For nearly twenty years, Israel has focused its efforts on preparing for the developments witnessed in recent weeks, particularly in terms of its intelligence capabilities regarding Hezbollah, which are remarkable.

Despite Israel’s success in eliminating several high-ranking Hezbollah leaders and causing significant damage to the group’s personnel through the use of advanced technology and airstrikes—some of which have resulted in civilian casualties—the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) continue to encounter strong resistance in southern Lebanon.

Hezbollah has also been gearing up for this confrontation.

“The assumption is that Israel will emerge victorious without incurring excessive losses. However, this is rarely the reality in guerrilla warfare,” Sobelman noted, emphasizing that Israel is operating in a region where Hezbollah has a significant advantage and is intent on inflicting maximum casualties on the IDF.

“Hezbollah fighters are well-entrenched in underground positions and are adopting a defensive strategy,” he explained. “Regardless of how many fighters are eliminated, in guerrilla warfare, the less powerful side often prevails by creating a sustained burden of costs.”

He stated that this mirrors the events of 2006, when Israel failed to secure a conclusive victory despite its advanced capabilities.

Although the IDF has not disclosed specifics regarding the deaths of its soldiers in Lebanon, Hezbollah has asserted that it successfully ambushed Israeli forces multiple times, claiming to have killed and wounded several troops.

The IDF appears resolute in its commitment to continue operations despite facing numerous challenges. On Wednesday, IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi stated that Israel intends to “strike Hezbollah with intensity, ensuring they receive no respite or opportunity for recovery.” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu further cautioned the Lebanese populace about the potential consequences of Hezbollah’s actions, suggesting they risk descending “into the abyss of a long war.”

However, there is a segment of Israeli society that questions the wisdom of entering Lebanon. Several residents from northern Israel expressed their concerns to CNN last week, indicating that a ground conflict could result in significant casualties.

Among those expressing dissent is Itamar Greenberg, an 18-year-old conscientious objector, who is williang to face imprisonment in opposition to the war. In Israel, military service is compulsory for most citizens, regardless of gender, and only a small number of young individuals choose to refuse service on ethical grounds, with a few facing incarceration each year.

Greenberg has currently served 60 days in prison—30 days following his first draft rejection and another 30 days after he was summoned again and declined once more. CNN interviewed him in Tel Aviv on Wednesday, just four days before he was set to return to prison for a third refusal to enlist.

Prior to the IDF’s attempts to draft him, Greenberg was an activist opposing the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the escalating violence perpetrated by Jewish settlers against Palestinian communities. Some protests escalated into violence after intervention from Israeli security forces, which has evidently affected Greenberg. He visibly flinched and glanced around anxiously when a police vehicle passed by with its sirens blaring.

In his conversation with CNN, Greenberg explained that his refusal to join the military is a protest against Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, its actions in Gaza, and most recently, its military operations in Lebanon. “The war in Lebanon began while I was incarcerated. I joked that I didn’t even have the opportunity to refuse all their f**king wars,” he remarked.

ASEAN leaders urged for a consensus on a code of conduct for the South China Sea

0

Southeast Asian leaders urged on Sunday for a prompt consensus on a code of conduct for the South China Sea, emphasizing adherence to international law. They also called for an immediate cessation of hostilities in Myanmar and advocated for inclusive peace negotiations to resolve the ongoing civil conflict.

The statement from the ASEAN chairman reflects the agreement reached during meetings that concluded on Friday among the ten-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Laos, which included representatives from the United States, Russia, China, Japan, India, and South Korea.

Tensions have been escalating in the contested waters of the South China Sea, where China asserts its claim over nearly the entire region, leading to disputes with ASEAN nations such as the Philippines and, more recently, Vietnam. These conflicts heighten the risk of escalation that could potentially involve the United States, which has a treaty obligation to defend the Philippines in the event of an attack.

The South China Sea, through which $3 trillion in trade flows annually, was a significant topic of discussion at the ASEAN meetings, particularly as Russia and China opposed references to the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, according to a U.S. official.

The ASEAN statement emphasized the need for confidence-building measures aimed at “reducing tensions and the risk of accidents, misunderstandings, and miscalculations” in the South China Sea. It highlighted the “positive momentum” in discussions regarding a maritime code that could aid in resolving disputes. Although China and ASEAN reached an agreement on this matter in 2002, the formal process for its development did not commence until 2017.

The bloc expressed its anticipation for the prompt establishment of an effective and substantive code of conduct that aligns with international law, including the U.N. convention, as stated in the announcement.

Regarding the escalating conflict in Myanmar, ASEAN urged for “an immediate cessation” of hostilities and the establishment of a “conducive environment for the delivery of humanitarian assistance and inclusive national dialogue” that is “Myanmar-owned and -led.” The ongoing conflict between Myanmar’s military government and a growing armed resistance poses a significant concern for the bloc, which has seen limited progress on a five-point peace plan introduced shortly after the 2021 coup that installed the junta.

An estimated 18.6 million individuals, representing over one-third of Myanmar’s population, are believed to require humanitarian aid.

ASEAN has expressed support for Thailand’s proposal to facilitate informal discussions regarding Myanmar, which may include participation from additional ASEAN member states later this year.

Taiwan reports Chinese carrier, China military video says ‘prepared for combat’

0

Taiwan reported on Sunday that a Chinese aircraft carrier group was navigating towards the southern region of the island, coinciding with a video release from China‘s military declaring its readiness for combat. This development has raised concerns in Taipei regarding the potential for renewed Chinese military exercises. China, which considers Taiwan—governed democratically—as part of its territory, regards President Lai Ching-te as a “separatist,” and the Chinese military frequently conducts operations in the vicinity of the island.

In his national day address last week, Lai asserted that the People’s Republic of China does not have the authority to represent Taiwan. However, he also expressed the island’s willingness to collaborate with Beijing on issues such as climate change, balancing a firm stance with a conciliatory approach, which provoked a strong reaction from China. Taiwan’s defense ministry announced that a Chinese naval group, led by the aircraft carrier Liaoning, had entered waters near the Bashi Channel, a crucial passage linking the South China Sea to the Pacific and separating Taiwan from the Philippines. The ministry indicated that the carrier group was anticipated to proceed into the Western Pacific.

Taiwan’s military is closely monitoring the situation and is “exercising appropriate vigilance and response,” according to the ministry, which did not provide further details. Prior to Lai’s speech, security sources in Taiwan indicated that his remarks might trigger new military exercises from China, the last of which occurred in May as a response to Lai’s inauguration address.

On Sunday, the Eastern Theatre Command of the People’s Liberation Army, responsible for the region encompassing Taiwan, released a propaganda video on social media titled “fully prepared and biding one’s time before battle.” The video featured fighter jets and naval vessels operating in unison, mobile missile launchers being positioned, and amphibious assault vehicles, along with a small map of Taiwan integrated into the title’s Chinese characters.

China has not dismissed the possibility of using military force to assert control over Taiwan. The Chinese defense ministry did not respond to inquiries made outside of regular office hours on Sunday, and the Taiwan Affairs Office did not provide an immediate comment.

A security official from Taiwan, who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the issue, informed Reuters that they are closely monitoring developments around the island, as well as the reactions from Chinese media regarding Lai’s national day address. Following Lai’s speech on Thursday, Chinese media has published various commentaries and articles criticizing the speech as “confrontational” and detrimental.

Comments on Chinese social media regarding a military “battle preparation” video have included calls for “Taiwan to return to the motherland” and for “national reunification.” Another security source in Taiwan, knowledgeable about intelligence evaluations, indicated that while it remains possible that China, cautious about provoking a crisis in light of the upcoming U.S. elections, may limit its response to mere rhetoric, there is still a chance for increased military exercises.

China is currently engaged in its annual drill season, and the official noted that the military could easily label these exercises as war games specifically aimed at Taiwan. Additionally, on Saturday, China’s commerce ministry issued threats of further trade sanctions against Taiwan, which the Taiwanese government perceives as a form of economic coercion. Lai and his administration reject Beijing’s claims of sovereignty, asserting that only the people of Taiwan have the authority to determine their future. Lai has consistently extended offers for dialogue with Beijing, but these overtures have been met with rejection.

Pakistan Army’s team earned the Gold Medal in Exercise Cambrian Patrol 2024

0

The Pakistan Army‘s team took part in Exercise Cambrian Patrol 2024, which took place in Wales, UK, from October 4 to 13, 2024. This year marked the 65th anniversary of the exercise.

As reported by the Pakistan Army’s media wing, ISPR, the exercise maintained its rigorous professional standards. Teams from around the world were required to navigate challenging terrains, covering a distance of 60 kilometers within 48 hours while completing specialized tasks in a contested environment.

This year, 128 teams from 42 countries participated in the exercise, and the Pakistan Army’s team distinguished itself with outstanding performance, earning the Gold Medal.

This achievement is a source of pride for the entire nation and the Pakistan Army, which is renowned for its professionalism and exceptional training standards. The Pakistan Army has consistently represented the country with honor.

Israeli forces expanded their operations in northern Gaza

0
Displaced Palestinians make their way as they flee areas in the northern Gaza Strip, following an Israeli evacuation order, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Gaza City.

Israeli forces have expanded their operations in northern Gaza, with tanks advancing to the northern outskirts of Gaza City and targeting several areas within the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood, according to local residents. This escalation has compelled numerous families to evacuate their homes.

According to residents, Israeli forces have effectively cut off Beit Hanoun, Jabalia, and Beit Lahiya in the northern region of the enclave from Gaza City, restricting movement between these areas unless families receive permission to leave in response to evacuation orders.

The health ministry in Gaza reported that the ongoing Israeli incursions, now in their eighth day, have resulted in numerous Palestinian fatalities, with many others feared dead on the roads or trapped under the debris of their homes, inaccessible to medical assistance.

Many residents of Jabalia have taken to social media to express their determination, stating, “We will not leave; we will die here rather than abandon our homes.” The northern region of Gaza, which is home to more than half of the enclave’s 2.3 million residents, was devastated during the initial phase of Israel’s military campaign last year, following the October 7 attacks by militants that resulted in the deaths of 1,200 individuals and the abduction of 250 hostages.

Following a year of Israeli military actions that resulted in the deaths of 42,000 Palestinians, many residents have returned to the devastated northern regions. Recently, Israel deployed troops to eliminate fighters it claims are reorganizing for further assaults. Hamas has refuted allegations that its fighters are operating among civilians.

The intensification of conflict in northern Gaza coincides with a significant Israeli airstrike and ground offensive in southern Lebanon targeting Hezbollah, which, like Hamas, is supported by Iran.

“As global attention shifts to Lebanon and the potential for an Israeli strike on Iran, Israel is systematically destroying Jabalia,” stated Nasser, a resident of Beit Lahiya in northern Gaza. “The occupation is demolishing roads and residential areas. People are struggling to find food and are confined to their homes, living in fear of falling bombs,” he communicated to Reuters through a messaging application.

The Israeli military announced on Sunday that its forces had targeted approximately 40 sites across the Gaza Strip over the past 24 hours, resulting in the deaths of numerous militants.

According to the statement, “Division 162 continues its operations in the Jabalia area, where dozens of terrorists have been killed and various explosives, weapons, grenades, and other military equipment have been discovered.”

In response, the armed factions of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other smaller groups reported that their fighters engaged Israeli forces in Jabalia and surrounding regions using anti-tank rockets and mortar fire.

Palestinian and United Nations representatives have indicated that there are no safe zones within Gaza. They have raised alarms about critical shortages of food, fuel, and medical supplies in northern Gaza, warning of a potential famine.

Residents reported that tank shells struck several streets in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood of Gaza City, where tanks have positioned themselves at the outskirts, causing widespread panic among the local population further south.

U.S. officials believe there are no signs that Israel plans to target Iran’s nuclear facilities

0
A machinery clears rubble at a site of an Israeli strike, amid ongoing hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, in Beirut, Lebanon.

U.S. officials have indicated that Israel has focused its potential response to Iran’s recent attack on military and energy infrastructure, as reported by NBC on Saturday. The situation in the Middle East remains tense, with heightened concerns over further escalation amid ongoing conflicts involving Israel, Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza.

Israel has consistently stated its intention to retaliate against Iran’s missile strikes on October 1, which were a response to Israeli military actions in Gaza and Lebanon, as well as the deaths of several Hamas and Hezbollah leaders.

According to the NBC report, there are no signs that Israel plans to target nuclear facilities or conduct assassinations, based on information from unnamed U.S. officials. It was also noted that Israel has yet to finalize its plans regarding the timing and nature of its response. U.S. and Israeli officials suggested that a reaction could occur during the ongoing Yom Kippur holiday.

The conflict between Israel and Hezbollah began a year ago when Hezbollah initiated rocket attacks on northern Israel coinciding with the onset of the Gaza war, and tensions have significantly intensified in recent weeks.

Hezbollah announced on Sunday that it is engaged in combat with Israeli forces attempting to penetrate the village of Ramya in southern Lebanon. In response, the Israeli military stated that it is actively conducting operations in southern Lebanon aimed at dismantling what it describes as “terrorist infrastructure.”

According to the Israeli Air Force (IAF), approximately 200 Hezbollah targets have been struck over the past day, including terrorist cells, missile launchers, and anti-tank positions throughout southern Lebanon. Additionally, the IAF reported intercepting five projectiles that originated from Lebanon.

In recent weeks, Israel has escalated its military actions, targeting southern Lebanon, the southern suburbs of Beirut, and the Bekaa Valley. This campaign has resulted in the deaths of numerous high-ranking Hezbollah leaders and the deployment of ground troops across the border. In retaliation, Hezbollah has launched rockets further into Israeli territory.

The intensified military operations have led to the displacement of over 1.2 million individuals, as reported by the Lebanese government, which also states that more than 2,100 people have lost their lives and around 10,000 have been injured during more than a year of conflict. This casualty figure does not differentiate between civilians and combatants but includes many women and children.

U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin conveyed significant concern during a conversation with Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on Saturday regarding reports of Israeli forces targeting U.N. peacekeeping positions in Lebanon in recent days. He urged Israel to prioritize the safety of these peacekeepers and the Lebanese military, as stated by the Pentagon.

According to the U.N. peacekeeping mission UNIFIL, five peacekeepers have sustained injuries in three distinct incidents since Thursday.

The ongoing conflict in the region, which involves various militant groups allied with Tehran, including Hezbollah, Yemen’s Houthis, and armed factions in Iraq, has heightened fears of a potential full-scale conflict between the United States and Iran in the oil-rich Middle East.

On Sunday, the Islamic Resistance in Iraq announced it had conducted drone strikes on a military site in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, framing this action as part of its support for the Palestinian people and Lebanon. The group indicated its intention to escalate attacks against Israeli positions.

The conflict in Gaza erupted following a Hamas-led assault on October 7, 2023, targeting southern Israeli communities, resulting in the deaths of 1,200 individuals and approximately 250 hostages, according to Israeli sources.

Israel’s military operations in Gaza, aimed at dismantling Hamas, have reportedly resulted in over 42,000 Palestinian fatalities, as per Gaza’s health ministry, and have devastated the region.

PTM, its historical context and key facts

0

The PTM has seemingly succeeded in organizing the Grand Jirga despite numerous challenges. To mitigate the impact of previous setbacks, the provincial chief executive was tasked with overseeing the event, while the federal government lifted its ban on the PTM. Previously, the federal authorities had prohibited the Pashtun Protection Movement and classified it as a banned organization. A notification from the Home Ministry issued last Sunday stated that the PTM was banned due to its alleged involvement in activities that threaten national security.

Within the context of our diverse national identity, the Pashtuns represent an ethnic group that has played a significant role in the intricate geopolitical landscape of South Asia over the last seventy-five years, residing on both sides of the Durand Line along the Pak-Afghan border.

The armed movement for an independent Pashtunistan, led by Mirza Ali, also known as Faqir Ipi, emerged in British India from 1936 to 1947, challenging the Afghan king Zahir Shah. This movement faced opposition from the prominent Pashtun leader Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, who criticized it as a British proxy. Interestingly, during the final years of his life (1944-1950), Faqir Ipi sought to restore the former Afghan king, Amanullah Ghazi, paralleling contemporary hopes within the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) for the return of Ashraf Ghani.

The book “Saint Warrior” by former Home Secretary Syed Mazhar Ali Shah, which chronicles Faqir Ipi’s struggle, has been banned by the provincial government and is considered a significant historical document. Following the partition of India in August 1947, the Cold War dynamics led to tragic events in which police, under the orders of NWFP Chief Minister Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan, killed activists of Bacha Khan’s movement in Babrra Ground, Charsadda. This massacre disillusioned Bacha Khan with national politics, prompting him to advocate for Pashtun “rights” akin to Faqir Ipi’s vision for an independent state. Subsequently, the Awami National Party sought to incite resistance through ethnic nationalism, raising Afghan flags for an independent Pashtunistan at the behest of Afghan authorities and promoting the slogan “Afghans on both sides of the border.” Juma Khan Sufi’s influential work, “Fareeb Natamam,” provides a comprehensive account of this historical narrative.

Following the Soviet Union’s military intervention in Kabul in 1979, amid the tensions between the two dominant global powers, U.S. authorities sought to suppress ethnic movements by fostering a jihadi culture along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. After the Soviet withdrawal from Kabul in 1988, Afghan society faced significant displacement and endured seven years of civil war. Ultimately, in 1995, the Afghan Taliban emerged from this turmoil, establishing a stringent religious regime in Afghanistan. Afghan Taliban restored the order but  positioned Kabul as a hub for global jihadi movements like Al-Qaeda, they also initiated terrorist activities worldwide, including in the Middle East. Consequently, following the events of September 11, the United States justified the deployment of NATO forces in Kabul to combat the Taliban, creating widespread anxiety throughout South Asia.

In 2003, following a prolonged period of silence lasting three years, jihadist groups initiated armed resistance against NATO forces, ultimately regaining control of Afghanistan after a two-decade-long guerrilla conflict. During this period TTP emerged in Pakistan’s tribal areas and started activities against state and its institutions. These activities not only led to the destruction of administrative structures and infrastructure in Pakhtunkhwa but also resulted in the disintegration of a once-cohesive tribal culture. The violence that ensued claimed the lives of numerous tribal elders, who had previously been regarded as the embodiment of the tribal culture, which had been governed by FCR laws for many years.

Meanwhile, prior to the American withdrawal from Kabul, the state sought to meet the expectations of global powers by integrating the tribal agencies in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, thereby exempting them from collective responsibility laws. This move aimed to incorporate the tribes into the broader national framework while maintaining a semblance of psychological cohesion.

In 2013, following President Obama’s principled decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Afghanistan, the Islamic Emirate of the Taliban established an office in Doha, Qatar. Concurrently, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) emerged in 2014, positioning itself as a defender of the rights of ethnic Pashtuns, a consequence of the prolonged American military engagement. After the U.S. withdrawal from Kabul in August 2021, the TTP, composed of armed tribal youth, initiated a series of violent campaigns across Pakistan. These attacks have primarily targeted police and security personnel, as well as the nation’s administrative structures and infrastructure, severely impacting the region’s rich cultural heritage and causing lasting damage.

To address the challenges posed by the TTP, our government mobilized public sentiment by initiating extensive military operations in the tribal regions adjacent to the western border, as well as in the administrative districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. This approach involved the forced displacement of residents and the restriction of fundamental freedoms at military checkpoints. Concurrently, movements such as the PTM have emerged, driven by accusations of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings targeting rights activists and ethnic leaders. These movements have increasingly criticized the military’s enduring presence within civilian communities. Over time, the PTM has evolved into a significant regional political entity, challenging not only traditional Pashtun nationalist parties but also marginalizing religious groups like JUI from the political landscape of the tribal areas.

The Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM), an unconventional organization, has significantly altered the dynamics of tribal society by mobilizing thousands for large-scale resistance rallies at its peak, advocating for enhanced state protection. This non-political movement, influenced by the actions of state institutions, is increasingly raising the flags of Afghanistan and promoting the message of “Afghans on both sides of the border.” Such developments, alongside the evolving geographical landscape of the region, may ultimately challenge the Taliban’s grip on power in Afghanistan and contribute to the decline of religious authoritarianism.

Emerging from the southeast, the PTM is well-coordinated with the armed national resistance led by figures such as Ahmad Shah Masood, Amr Saleh, and Ashraf Ghani from the north, all rallying under the Afghan flag. This movement also resonates with the historical aspirations of Bacha Khan for an independent Pashtunistan.

There is no question that during the Cold War, our leaders in the colonial capital suppressed political parties with communist ideologies while fostering religious politics and a culture of jihad. However, in today’s rapidly evolving global landscape, Western powers appear to be constraining the political influence of religious parties and encouraging ethnic movements.

It seems that these global powers are seeking to expand opportunities for Pashtun and Baloch ethnic groups, as well as secular parties, particularly in South Asia, amid this recent shift in paradigms. When we examine the PTM movement within a historical framework, it appears that our authorities, under the influence of global powers, are also promoting the PTM using similar strategies to facilitate the establishment of a more inclusive national government in Afghanistan. This approach seems to be part of a broader plan to entrap the Taliban government, reminiscent of how the British government ensnared the Zahir Shah government in Afghanistan to bolster the Faqir-Ipi movement.

Numerous organizations funded by international bodies, such as the Human Rights Commission, have remained conspicuously silent regarding the genocide of countless innocent children, women, and civilians in Gaza, Syria, Iraq, and Libya. In contrast, they have advocated the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM). In response to the government’s decision, they criticized the ban on a “rights-based movement” that has consistently adhered to non-violence and operated within the constitutional framework to promote its objectives, describing the action as lacking transparency.

Furthermore, it is important to note that since World War II, the United States has often utilized human rights organizations as instruments to intervene in the domestic matters of vulnerable nations globally.

US Navy ship engaged in joint exercises with Pakistan Navy in the Arabian Sea

0

The USS O’Kane, a ship of the US Navy, made a visit to Karachi where it engaged in joint exercises with the Pakistan Navy‘s PNS Babar in the Arabian Sea.

As stated by a spokesperson for the Pakistan Navy, the objective of these exercises was to strengthen collaborative efforts and to reaffirm the commitment of both navies towards ensuring maritime peace in the region.

During the visit, the Commanding Officer of the USS O’Kane held discussions with Rear Admiral Abdul Muneeb, Commander of the Pakistan Fleet, focusing on enhancing cooperation and sharing tactical knowledge related to naval operations.

This visit and the accompanying exercises underscore the Pakistan Navy’s dedication to fostering regional peace and maritime stability in collaboration with international allies. Such partnerships have been instrumental in addressing issues like terrorism, piracy, and trafficking, both within the region and globally.

The arrival of the US Navy ship in Pakistan highlights the strong ties between the two navies and reflects the broader relationship between the two nations.

What behind the tensions between China and the Philippines in South China Sea?

0

A territorial dispute between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea has escalated into violence, with both nations accusing each other of deliberate boat rammings. The Philippines has specifically accused Chinese coastguard personnel of deploying water cannons against its forces and engaging in physical altercations involving spears and knives.

In August alone, there were six reported confrontations in the air and at sea within this contested region. Five of these incidents occurred at or near Scarborough Shoal and Sabina Shoal in the Spratly Islands, areas that fall within the Philippines’ 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), yet are claimed by China.

These confrontations have arisen despite renewed attempts by both Beijing and Manila to manage their maritime disputes more effectively, following a violent incident in June that resulted in a Filipino sailor losing a finger.

China has attributed the confrontations to the Philippines, accusing its troops of “illegally” entering Chinese territory. In September, China indicated that its relationship with the Philippines was “at a crossroads” and urged Manila to “seriously consider the future” of their diplomatic ties.

The rising tensions pose a risk of involving the United States, which holds a mutual defense agreement with the Philippines and has committed to supporting Manila in the event of armed attacks against Filipino forces. This protection extends to coastguard personnel, aircraft, or public vessels located “anywhere” in the South China Sea.

Here are the key points regarding the tensions in this crucial maritime region:

Who asserts what?

China asserts sovereignty over nearly the entirety of the South China Sea, delineated by a vague, U-shaped nine-dash line that intersects with the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam. EEZs are maritime zones extending 200 nautical miles from a country’s coastline, granting that nation the rights to explore and utilize resources.

In the northern region of the South China Sea, sovereignty over the Paracel Islands is claimed by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam, although Beijing has maintained control since 1974. In the southern region, all parties—China, Taiwan, and Vietnam—assert claims over the approximately 200 Spratly Islands, while Brunei, Malaysia, and the Philippines claim portions of them.

In 2016, a United Nations tribunal ruled, in response to a case brought by the Philippines, that China’s nine-dash line lacked legal standing. However, Beijing has disregarded this ruling and has continued to reclaim and militarize reefs and submerged features in the area to bolster its extensive claims.

According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a think tank based in the United States, China operates 20 outposts in the Paracel Islands and seven in the Spratlys.

In contrast, Vietnam has established 51 outposts across 27 features, while the Philippines occupies nine features in the Spratly Islands. Thitu Island, the largest of these, hosts the only Philippine airstrip in the Spratlys.

China’s Military Expansion in the South China Sea

While various nations in the South China Sea have engaged in land reclamation activities at their respective locations, China’s efforts in constructing artificial islands and militarizing these areas have significantly outpaced those of other claimants. Since 2013, China has developed approximately 3,200 acres (1,290 hectares) of new land in the Spratly Islands, as reported by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and has established ports, lighthouses, and runways on these newly formed islands.

Currently, China operates four major outposts in the South China Sea, each featuring runways that extend 3,050 meters (10,000 feet). These outposts include Woody Island in the Paracel Islands, as well as Fiery Cross Reef, Mischief Reef, and Subi Reef in the Spratlys.

CSIS indicates that China has stationed a significant array of military resources on these islands, which encompasses anti-aircraft and anti-ship missile systems, surveillance and communication installations, and hangars designed to accommodate military transport, patrol, and combat aircraft.

significant strategic importance of South China Sea

The South China Sea holds significant strategic importance due to its status as one of the globe’s most vital maritime trade routes, facilitating the transport of approximately $3.4 trillion in cargo annually.

Additionally, the region is home to abundant fishing areas that sustain the livelihoods of millions of individuals in surrounding nations.

The US Energy Information Administration estimates that the South China Sea harbors around 11 billion barrels of oil classified as proven or probable reserves, along with approximately 190 trillion cubic feet (about 5.38 trillion cubic meters) of natural gas. The untapped potential of these hydrocarbons is valued at around $2.5 trillion.

Tensions have arisen as Chinese vessels have confronted or engaged in standoffs with survey ships from countries such as Vietnam, the Philippines, and Malaysia, hindering their efforts to access these resources.

In September, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim asserted that Malaysia would resist Chinese pressure to cease its oil and gas exploration activities in areas it claims off the coast of Sarawak. In 2020, the Diplomat magazine reported that Vietnam had to cancel contracts with two oil companies from Spain and the UAE due to Chinese influence, resulting in a $1 billion compensation payment. Furthermore, in 2012, Vietnam cautioned China to stop its development activities in regions already allocated to companies like Exxon Mobil Corp and OAO Gazprom.

Ultimately, for China, asserting control over the South China Sea would enhance its dominance over a crucial trade corridor and bolster its energy security, while also enabling it to restrict access to foreign military forces, particularly those from the United States.

Increasing Conflicts

In recent decades, the tensions among China, Vietnam, and the Philippines have escalated significantly.

In 1974, China took control of the Paracel Islands from Vietnam, resulting in the deaths of over 70 Vietnamese soldiers. A subsequent confrontation occurred in 1988 in the Spratly Islands, where Vietnam lost approximately 60 sailors. The Philippines has faced its most significant disputes with China over Scarborough Shoal, Second Thomas Shoal, and more recently, Sabina Shoal.

In 2012, China effectively took over Scarborough Shoal from the Philippines after a protracted two-month standoff. In the years that followed, Chinese coastguard and maritime militia vessels have attempted to obstruct supply boats delivering food and water to Filipino troops stationed on a ship that was intentionally grounded at Second Thomas Shoal in 1999. Reports from the Philippines indicate that China has employed various aggressive tactics, including ramming boats, using military-grade lasers, and deploying water cannons.

Timeline of the key incidents

  • In March 1959, South Vietnamese forces detained 82 Chinese fishermen in the Crescent Group of the Paracel Islands.
  • In January 1974, Chinese military units took control of the Paracel Islands following a conflict that resulted in over 100 South Vietnamese casualties.
  • From January to March 1988, China established its presence at Fiery Cross Reef and Cuarteron Reef in the Spratly Islands, the latter of which was claimed by Vietnam.
  • In March 1988, a confrontation occurred between Chinese and Vietnamese forces over Johnson South Reef in the Spratlys, during which the Chinese navy sank three Vietnamese ships, leading to the deaths of 74 sailors in a significant military clash in the South China Sea.
  • In January 1996, a 90-minute naval engagement took place between Chinese and Philippine forces near Capones Island, close to Mischief Reef, which had been occupied by Chinese troops the previous year.
  • In April 2012, a two-month standoff unfolded between the Chinese and Philippine navies at Scarborough Shoal, culminating in both sides withdrawing. However, by July, China claimed control over the area.
  • In May 2014, a Vietnamese fishing boat sank near a Chinese oil rig located off the coast of Vietnam, within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Vietnamese reports alleged that a Chinese vessel collided with the fishing boat, while the Chinese state news agency Xinhua stated that the boat capsized while “interfering with and ramming” a Chinese fishing vessel.
  • In July 2019, a prolonged standoff occurred between Vietnamese and Chinese vessels near an offshore oil block situated in waters claimed by both Vietnam’s EEZ and the nine-dash line.
  • In February 2020, the Philippines reported that a Chinese navy ship directed its gun control at a Philippine corvette in the Spratly Islands.
  • By May 2020, a lengthy standoff involving Chinese, Malaysian, and Vietnamese ships within Malaysia’s EEZ concluded when a Malaysian drillship, which had been exploring contested oil and gas fields, departed the area.
  • In March 2021, the Philippines called for the withdrawal of approximately 200 Chinese vessels, including those suspected to be part of a maritime militia, from the waters surrounding Whitsun Reef in the Spratlys.
  • In November 2022, the Philippines accused the Chinese coastguard of forcibly taking Chinese rocket debris that was being towed by the Philippine navy in the South China Sea.
  • On February 13, 2023, the Philippines charged that China’s coastguard aimed a “military-grade laser” at its personnel stationed on the BPS Sierra Madre at Second Thomas Shoal.
  •  On August 5, 2023, the Philippines claimed that China’s coastguard obstructed and used a water cannon against a supply vessel delivering provisions to troops on the BPS Sierra Madre.
  • Between October 22 and 24, 2023, the Philippines alleged that Chinese coastguard ships deliberately collided with its vessels that were regularly supplying forces at Second Thomas Shoal, with no injuries reported.
  • On December 9, 2023, the Philippines accused China of using water cannons against its boats, including one carrying the military chief, and of ramming other vessels, resulting in significant engine damage. In response, China’s coastguard asserted that the Philippine vessel had intentionally collided with its ship.
  • On February 10, 2024, the Philippine coastguard accused China of engaging in “dangerous and obstructive” maneuvers while its vessel was patrolling near Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea earlier this month.
  • March 5, 2024 – The Philippines has criticized China for the “reckless” and “illegal” conduct of its coastguard, which resulted in a collision between a Chinese vessel and a Philippine ship. This incident, occurring during a resupply mission for troops stationed at the Second Thomas Shoal, caused damage to the Philippine ship and injuries to some crew members. In response, China claimed that the Philippine vessels had intruded into waters near the shoal.
  • March 24, 2024 – China’s coastguard announced that it had taken action against Philippine vessels engaged in a resupply mission for troops at the Second Thomas Shoal. The Philippines condemned these actions, which included the use of water cannons that resulted in damage to its ship and injuries to its crew, labeling them as “irresponsible and provocative.”
  • June 17, 2024 – A collision occurred between a Chinese vessel and a Philippine supply ship close to the Second Thomas Shoal. The Philippines reported that Chinese personnel armed with knives and spears assaulted its sailors, leading to one crew member losing a finger. China has denied these allegations.
  • August 8, 2024 – The Philippines reported that two Chinese aircraft performed a hazardous maneuver and released flares in the vicinity of a Filipino aircraft conducting a routine patrol over Scarborough Shoal. China contended that the Philippine aircraft had illegally intruded despite multiple warnings.
  • August 19, 2024 – The Philippines and China have exchanged accusations regarding ramming vessels and executing dangerous maneuvers near the Sabina Shoal. Manila stated that the collision resulted in structural damage to its ships.
  • August 19, 2024 – The Philippines reported that a Chinese fighter jet engaged in aggressive maneuvers against a Filipino surveillance aircraft near Scarborough Shoal, allegedly by deploying flares at dangerously close range multiple times.
  • August 22, 2024 – The Philippines has accused China of unjustifiably launching flares from Subi Reef towards its patrol aircraft.
  • August 25, 2024 – A collision occurred between Chinese and Filipino vessels near Sabina Shoal, with Manila alleging that the Chinese coastguard deliberately rammed its ship and used water cannons to obstruct what it described as a resupply mission for fishermen. In response, Beijing attributed the incident to Manila’s actions.
  • August 26, 2024 – The Philippine Coast Guard reported that China dispatched 40 vessels, including three naval warships, to hinder a resupply operation for another ship on extended patrol in the Sabina Shoal. China’s Coast Guard claimed it implemented control measures against Filipino vessels that had unlawfully entered the waters surrounding Sabina.
  • August 31, 2024 – The Philippines and China once again exchanged accusations of deliberately ramming coastguard vessels near Sabina Shoal. Manila stated that the ramming incident caused damage to the Teresa Magbanua, a 97-meter (320-foot) vessel and one of the largest in the Philippine coast guard fleet.

Israeli military operations in Gaza resulted in deaths of at least 19 Palestinians

0
Displaced Palestinians make their way as they flee areas in the northern Gaza Strip, following an Israeli evacuation order, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Gaza City.

Israeli military operations in Gaza overnight resulted in the deaths of at least 19 Palestinians, according to medics on Saturday. Meanwhile, forces have intensified their advance into the Jabalia region, where international relief organizations report that thousands of individuals are trapped.

Local residents indicated that Israeli forces have been relentlessly targeting Jabalia, the largest of the enclave’s historic refugee camps located in the northern part of Gaza, through both aerial and ground assaults.

While there has been no recent official statement from Israeli authorities, the military previously announced that operations in Jabalia and surrounding areas had led to the elimination of numerous militants, the discovery of weapon caches, and the dismantling of military infrastructure. This operation commenced a week ago, with the military stating its objective was to combat Hamas militants conducting attacks and to hinder their ability to regroup. Palestinian health officials estimate that approximately 150 individuals have lost their lives in Jabalia over the past week.

On Friday, Israeli airstrikes targeted four residences in Jabalia, resulting in approximately 20 fatalities and numerous injuries, according to medical sources. The Israeli military has deployed troops to the adjacent towns of Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahiya, as well as Jabalia, instructing residents to evacuate to safer locations in the southern part of the enclave.

Palestinian and United Nations representatives have stated that there are no genuinely safe areas within Gaza. They have expressed alarm over critical shortages of food, fuel, and medical supplies in northern Gaza, warning of a potential famine in the region.

The Ministry of Health has indicated that Israel’s threats to forcibly evacuate three operational hospitals pose a significant risk to the safety of both patients and healthcare personnel. Since the onset of Israel’s military operations in Gaza, aimed at dismantling the militant group Hamas, over 42,000 Palestinians have reportedly lost their lives, as per the Gaza health ministry, leading to widespread devastation across the enclave.

The conflict erupted following a Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, targeting southern Israeli communities, which resulted in 1,200 deaths and approximately 250 individuals taken hostage, according to Israeli reports.

On Saturday, Hamas issued a statement claiming that Israel’s “massacre of civilians” was intended to penalize the inhabitants of Jabalia for their unwillingness to evacuate their homes. The group also interpreted this as evidence of Israel’s military inability to overcome them. Israel has refuted allegations that it intentionally targets civilians.

Meanwhile, the military branches of Hamas, along with Islamic Jihad and other smaller factions, reported that their fighters engaged Israeli forces in Jabalia and surrounding regions using anti-tank rockets and mortar fire.

POLIO VACCINATIONS

On Friday, United Nations officials indicated that the ongoing Israeli military actions and evacuation directives in northern Gaza could potentially disrupt the second phase of the polio vaccination initiative scheduled to commence next week.

The health ministry of the territory announced on Saturday that the campaign is set to begin on Monday in central areas of the Gaza Strip, lasting for three days before extending to other regions.

Aid organizations conducted an initial round of vaccinations last month following a case of partial paralysis in a baby caused by the type 2 poliovirus in August, marking the first occurrence of such a case in the territory in 25 years.

Similar to the first phase, planned humanitarian pauses in the conflict are intended to facilitate the vaccination of hundreds of thousands of children.