Wednesday, April 22, 2026
Home Blog Page 117

U.S. is urging Ukraine to lower the minimum military service age to 18 to bolster its forces

0
A Ukrainian service member attends military exercises during drills at a training ground, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Chernihiv region, Ukraine.

A senior U.S. administration official stated on Wednesday that Ukraine should contemplate reducing the military service age to 18 years. This recommendation aims to encourage Kyiv to strengthen its military forces amid the ongoing conflict with Russia.

During a press briefing, the official expressed concerns that Ukraine is not adequately mobilizing or training sufficient new soldiers for the war effort.

“The current priority is manpower,” he noted. “The Russians are indeed making steady advancements in the east and are starting to push back Ukrainian positions in Kursk. Increased mobilization and additional personnel could have a substantial impact on the current battlefield situation.”

No quick resolution for Gaza is expected after the Lebanon ceasefire

0
Children at tent camp for displaced people in Gaza

Following a resolution to end over a year of conflict between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, focus has shifted back to the heavily impacted Gaza Strip. However, expectations for a swift conclusion to the ongoing war there appear increasingly unlikely.

A ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah came into effect early Wednesday morning, halting hostilities that had intensified significantly in recent months and overshadowed Israel’s concurrent conflict with Hamas militants in Gaza.

In announcing the agreement regarding Lebanon on Tuesday, U.S. President Joe Biden expressed his intention to renew efforts for a difficult resolution in Gaza, urging both Israel and Hamas to take advantage of the current situation.

Nevertheless, there are no indications that Israeli leaders intend to relax their stance towards Hamas, which instigated the conflict last year by launching attacks on southern Israel. Israeli ministers have made it clear that their objectives for Gaza differ markedly from those in Lebanon.

“Gaza will never pose a threat to the state of Israel again… We will achieve a decisive victory there. Lebanon is a different matter,” stated Israel’s Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter, who is part of the inner security cabinet and a former head of the Shin Bet intelligence agency.

“Are we at the beginning of the end of the Gaza campaign? Absolutely not. We still have much work ahead,” he remarked to a group of foreign journalists this week.

A total of 101 Israeli hostages are still being held in Gaza, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to secure their return while also aiming to eliminate Hamas.

Efforts to negotiate between the two parties have been stagnant for an extended period, with each side attributing the deadlock to the other. On Wednesday, Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri accused Israel of a lack of flexibility, asserting that his group remains open to reaching an agreement.

“We hope that this agreement (with Hezbollah) will create a pathway to a resolution that puts an end to the genocide against our people in Gaza,” he stated to Reuters.

Both Israel and the United States have criticized Hamas for not engaging in negotiations sincerely.

ONGOING CONFLICT

The conflict in Gaza has persisted far longer than anticipated. Over the course of 14 months, significant destruction has occurred, resulting in the deaths of 44,000 Palestinians, while Israeli forces continue to conduct daily operations throughout the coastal region in an effort to dismantle Hamas.

The announcement that Hezbollah has chosen to cease hostilities has left many residents of Gaza feeling despondent and overlooked, although some still cling to the hope that circumstances may improve.

“They say that if it rains in one area, it brings good fortune to another. We hope that after Lebanon, attention will shift to Gaza to bring an end to the conflict,” expressed Aya, 30, a displaced individual currently living with her family in a tent in central Gaza.

Faint signs of optimism have emerged in Egypt, which plays a pivotal role in facilitating dialogue between Israel and Hamas. Two Egyptian security officials reported that Israel has communicated to Cairo that if the ceasefire in Lebanon remains intact, they would resume efforts towards a deal concerning Gaza.

U.S. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan indicated that President Biden would initiate a renewed effort for a Gaza ceasefire on Wednesday, engaging with Turkey, Qatar, Egypt, and other regional stakeholders.

However, with Donald Trump set to assume the U.S. presidency in January, he has expressed intentions to work towards ending the conflict but has not provided a specific strategy for achieving this. Given past experiences with Trump, who is a staunch ally of Israel, Palestinians remain skeptical.

DISASSOCIATING CONFLICTS

Israeli and U.S. officials have praised the Lebanese agreement for compelling Hezbollah, which, like Hamas, receives support from Iran, to separate itself from the Gaza situation.

Nonetheless, Ofer Shelah, a senior researcher at Tel Aviv University’s Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), cautioned that this separation may ultimately complicate efforts to halt the violence in Gaza.

“There will be no significant pressure on Israel regarding Gaza now,” Shelah told Reuters.

He further noted that it may not align with Prime Minister Netanyahu’s interests to pursue peace with Hamas in the near future, as it could destabilize his government, which is filled with hardliners—some of whom have criticized the Lebanon agreement and seek to take control of Gaza.

“I believe it serves his political agenda for the conflict to persist, as concluding the war in Gaza could genuinely jeopardize this coalition,” Shelah stated.

The families of the Israeli hostages voiced their frustration over Netanyahu’s decision to agree to a separate ceasefire in Lebanon. They suggested that Hezbollah, having endured significant losses over the past year, may have exerted influence on Hamas to release the hostages in exchange for halting the conflict.

Hamas is demanding the release of Palestinian prisoners in exchange for the remaining hostages taken during the October 7, 2023, attack, which resulted in approximately 1,200 fatalities in southern Israel. Additionally, Hamas has called for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the enclave and firmly rejects any conditions requiring it to disarm or disband.

Highlighting the stark differences in their positions, Dichter stated that it is inconceivable for Hamas to have any future role in Gaza, nor does he foresee a quick withdrawal of the Israeli military from the area.

“We intend to maintain our presence in Gaza for an extended period,” he asserted.

Israel has informed the ICC of its intention to contest the arrest warrants, according to Netanyahu

0
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Israel has notified the International Criminal Court of its intention to appeal the arrest warrants issued for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant regarding their actions during the Gaza war, as stated by Netanyahu’s office on Wednesday.

Netanyahu also mentioned that U.S. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham had briefed him on various initiatives he is advocating in the U.S. Congress aimed at countering the International Criminal Court and nations that choose to cooperate with it.

Last Thursday, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu, his former defense chief, and Hamas military leader Ibrahim Al-Masri, also known as Mohammed Deif, citing alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the Gaza conflict.

“Today, Israel has formally submitted a notice to the International Criminal Court indicating its plan to appeal the court’s decision, along with a request to suspend the enforcement of the arrest warrants,” Netanyahu stated.

Biden administration is reportedly preparing a $680 million arms sale to Israel

0
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during a dinner with U.S. service members and their families ahead of Thanksgiving at U.S. Coast Guard Sector New York on Staten Island, New York, U.S.

The Biden administration is advancing a $680 million arms sales initiative to Israel, as confirmed by a U.S. official acquainted with the details on Wednesday. This move occurs concurrently with the implementation of a U.S.-mediated ceasefire in Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah.

As reported initially by the Financial Times, the arms package comprises thousands of joint direct attack munition kits (JDAM) and several hundred small-diameter bombs, according to the official, who requested to remain unnamed.

Lebanon’s ceasefire expands the Hezbollah-free zone and clarifies the UN resolution’s terms

0
Hezbollah members parade during a rally marking al-Quds Day,

A ceasefire agreement reached between Lebanon and Israel broadens the designated area that is expected to be free from Hezbollah‘s arms and clarifies the authority of Lebanese security forces to carry weapons. This agreement features more precise language than previous U.N. resolutions, which analysts and diplomats suggest may put Hezbollah in a difficult position.

The Lebanese cabinet released the deal on Wednesday, which spans just over five pages and includes a map detailing southern Lebanon.

The designated area free from Hezbollah weaponry is marked by a red line labeled “New 2024 line,” extending east-west across the country.

It begins approximately 25 kilometers (15 miles) north of the Israeli border along the coast and continues eastward, primarily following the Litani River before veering north of the town of Yohmor, thus extending beyond the region outlined in U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which aimed to eliminate non-state arms.

Resolution 1701 concluded the last conflict between Hezbollah and Israel in 2006.

The newly defined zone encompasses Beaufort Castle, a strategic Crusader-era fortress that overlooks the Israeli border, according to retired army brigadier general Hassan Jouni.

The 2006 resolution also stipulated that there would be “no weapons without the consent of the Government of Lebanon” throughout Lebanese territory.

The newly established ceasefire agreement expands its scope by specifying that only “official military and security forces” in Lebanon are permitted to carry weapons. This designation includes the Lebanese Armed Forces, the Internal Security Forces, General Security, State Security, Lebanese customs, and municipal police.

Jouni remarked, “This clearly indicates a commitment to implementation, eliminating any ambiguity that could lead to misinterpretation.”

He emphasized that this arrangement benefits the Lebanese state and its official institutions, while not serving Hezbollah’s interests.

Since 2008, officials from both the Beirut government and the Iran-backed Hezbollah, which holds significant political power in Lebanon, have interpreted cabinet statements affirming the right to “resistance” as tacit approval for Hezbollah’s armament.

Two Lebanese officials informed Reuters that they did not view the additional language in the new agreement as alarming, asserting that the primary achievement was the cessation of hostilities.

However, diplomats noted that the phrasing might provide Israel with greater leverage than it had after 2006 to hinder Hezbollah from re-arming or repositioning its fighters and weapons.

A regional diplomat commented, “Lebanon either had no alternative or believes it can navigate this situation cleverly.”

A senior Western diplomat indicated that Israel’s position had significantly strengthened following extensive strikes that decimated much of Hezbollah’s leadership and displaced over 1.2 million individuals, allowing it to effectively set the terms.

When asked about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s remarks regarding Israel’s military freedom to act against Hezbollah if the agreement was breached, Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah responded that the group would maintain its right to self-defense in the event of an Israeli attack.

Nordic and Baltic nations, plus Poland, will boost ammunition support for Ukraine

0

Nordic and Baltic nations, along with Poland, announced on Wednesday their intention to enhance support for Ukraine in the upcoming months. This will include bolstering the country’s defense industry and increasing the availability of ammunition.

In a joint statement, the leaders of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway, Poland, and Sweden emphasized their commitment to strengthening deterrence and defense capabilities, including resilience against both conventional and hybrid threats. They also expressed intentions to expand sanctions against Russia and those who facilitate its aggression.

The leaders convened at the Swedish government’s retreat in Harpsund, located southwest of Stockholm, to discuss transatlantic relations, regional security collaboration, and a unified approach to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

The prospect of Donald Trump serving a second presidential term has sparked concerns regarding the United States’ dedication to supporting Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, as well as its role within NATO.

Many experts suggest that Europe may need to increase its defense spending and support for Ukraine’s military efforts following Trump’s inauguration in January.

The Nordic and Baltic countries, several of which share borders with Russia, are among Ukraine’s most significant supporters. According to the Kiel Institute’s Ukraine Support Tracker, aid from these regions and Poland amounts to approximately 24 billion euros, making them the second-largest contributors after the United States.

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson emphasized in a separate statement that Europe must assume a larger role in ensuring its own security. He noted that this requires enhanced cooperation and sustained support for Ukraine, which is defending not only its own sovereignty but also the security of Europe as a whole in the long run.

Russia has stated that it will take action if the United States deploys missiles in Japan

0
Spokeswoman of Russia's Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova

On Wednesday, Russia expressed that the potential deployment of U.S. missiles in Japan would pose a threat to its national security, prompting a possible retaliatory response from Moscow.

According to a report from Japan’s Kyodo news agency on Sunday, Japan and the United States are working on a joint military strategy in response to a potential crisis in Taiwan, which includes the deployment of missiles.

The report, citing unnamed sources from both the U.S. and Japan, indicated that the plan involves positioning U.S. missile units in Japan’s Nansei Islands, specifically in the southwestern Kagoshima and Okinawa prefectures, as well as in the Philippines.

Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, accused Japan of heightening tensions surrounding Taiwan to rationalize its growing military collaboration with the United States.

“We have consistently warned Japan that the introduction of American medium-range missiles on its territory, as a result of this cooperation, would constitute a genuine threat to our security, compelling us to take necessary and appropriate measures to bolster our defense capabilities,” she stated.

Zakharova suggested that Japan could gain insight into the nature of these measures by reviewing Russia’s recently updated nuclear doctrine, which was released last week and broadened the scenarios under which Russia might consider the use of nuclear weapons.

On Monday, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov indicated that Russia would contemplate the deployment of short- and intermediate-range missiles in Asia if the U.S. were to place similar missiles on the continent.

When asked about this statement, Zakharova refrained from specifying potential locations for Russian missile deployments but emphasized that a significant portion of Russia’s territory lies in Asia, meaning any missiles positioned east of the Urals would be in that region.

She asserted that Moscow has communicated a clear message to the United States and its allies that it would respond decisively and symmetrically to the deployment of land-based medium and shorter-range missiles globally.

She emphasized that the West should not underestimate Russia’s capabilities following the recent launch of the Oreshnik, a new hypersonic intermediate-range missile, aimed at a target in Ukraine last week.

US brokers the release of three Americans detained in China, reports Politico

0
The flags of the United States and China fly from a lamppost in the Chinatown neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.

The United States has facilitated the release of three American citizens through a negotiation with China, which involves the exchange of unnamed Chinese individuals currently detained in the U.S., as reported by Politico on Wednesday, referencing a source within the Biden administration.

The arrangement encompasses the release of Americans Mark Swidan, Kai Li, and John Leung, according to the Politico article, which highlighted confidential diplomatic discussions that have not yet been publicly disclosed.

France holds the view that Netanyahu is protected from actions initiated by the ICC

0
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

France stated on Wednesday that it believes Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu enjoys immunity from actions taken by the International Criminal Court (ICC), which is pursuing his arrest for alleged war crimes in Gaza, as Israel is not a signatory to the court’s statutes.

This perspective from France, released a day after a ceasefire was announced between Israel and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, facilitated by the U.S. and France, has faced criticism from human rights organizations. Other nations, including Italy, have also raised questions regarding the legality of the ICC’s mandate.

The French Foreign Ministry issued a statement affirming its intention to maintain close cooperation with Netanyahu.

It took nearly a week for Paris to articulate a definitive stance following the ICC’s issuance of arrest warrants on November 21 for Netanyahu, his former defense chief, and a leader of the Hamas militant group.

Initially, France indicated it would comply with the ICC statutes, but subsequently refined its position in a statement on November 22, expressing concerns that Israel’s actions could undermine ceasefire negotiations in Lebanon. The ministry noted that the court’s decision was merely a formalization of an accusation.

On Wednesday, the ministry emphasized that the Rome Statute, which established the ICC, stipulates that a country cannot be compelled to act in a way that contradicts its obligations regarding the immunities of states that are not parties to the ICC.

“Such immunities apply to Prime Minister Netanyahu and other relevant ministers and must be considered if the ICC requests their arrest and surrender.”

The statement from the French ministry highlighted the longstanding friendship between two democracies dedicated to upholding the rule of law. It expressed France’s commitment to collaborating closely with Netanyahu and other Israeli officials “to foster peace and security for all in the Middle East.”

Human rights organizations indicated that France may have moderated its stance to preserve a cooperative relationship with Netanyahu and his administration.

“France’s comments are quite troubling. No individual is exempt from an ICC arrest warrant due to their official position—this applies to Netanyahu, Putin, and others,” stated Andrew Stroehlein, European media director at Human Rights Watch, on X. He referenced Article 27 of the Rome Statute, which addresses the ‘irrelevance of official capacity.’ Amnesty International described France’s stance as “deeply concerning.” They urged that instead of implying that ICC indictees might have immunity, France should clearly affirm its obligation under the Rome Statute to execute arrest warrants.

Abbas Araghchi asserts that Tehran reserves the right to retaliate against the Israeli airstrikes

0
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi gives a briefing on the sidelines of a UN event in Lisbon, Portugal.

Tehran maintains the right to respond to the Israeli airstrikes that occurred last month, while also considering the broader regional context, stated Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Wednesday.

During a press briefing in Lisbon, Araghchi expressed Iran’s approval of the ceasefire agreement reached in Lebanon on Tuesday, emphasizing hopes for its transformation into a lasting peace. This ceasefire, which took effect on Wednesday, was facilitated by the United States and France and involves a truce between Israel and Hezbollah, the group backed by Iran.

When questioned about the potential for the ceasefire to reduce tensions between Israel and Iran, he remarked, “It hinges on Israel’s actions.” He added, “While we assert our right to respond to the recent Israeli aggression, we are also mindful of all developments in the region.” Israel conducted strikes on Iranian targets on October 26 in response to an Iranian missile attack on October 1.

Additionally, Ali Larijani, a senior advisor to Iran’s supreme leader, indicated in an interview with Iran’s Tasnim news agency that the country is preparing to “respond” to Israel.

ICC prosecutor seeks arrest warrant for Myanmar military leader over Rohingya campaign

0
Myanmar's junta chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing presides over an army parade on Armed Forces Day in Naypyitaw, Myanmar.

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) announced on Wednesday his intention to pursue an arrest warrant for Myanmar‘s military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, in connection with crimes against humanity related to the alleged persecution of the Rohingya, a predominantly Muslim minority group.

A representative from Myanmar’s ruling junta did not provide an immediate response to inquiries for comment.

Approximately one million Rohingya individuals fled, primarily to neighboring Bangladesh, to escape a military offensive initiated by Myanmar in August 2017, which U.N. investigators have characterized as a clear instance of ethnic cleansing.

According to U.N. investigators, soldiers, police, and Buddhist civilians are accused of destroying hundreds of villages in Myanmar’s remote Rakhine state, torturing residents as they attempted to escape, and committing mass killings and gang rapes.

Myanmar has refuted these claims, asserting that its security forces were engaged in legitimate operations against militants who had attacked police stations.

Currently, most refugees are living in dire conditions in camps in Bangladesh.

“He [Min Aung Hlaing] is accountable for orchestrating the genocide against the innocent Rohingya people,” stated Mohammed Zubair, a Rohingya researcher residing in a refugee camp in Bangladesh. “Under his leadership, the military has killed thousands of Rohingya and subjected numerous women and girls to horrific sexual violence.”

Pursuing a warrant for “the individual who holds the highest military position in Myanmar sends a powerful message to perpetrators that no one is above the law,” remarked Nicholas Koumjian, head of the U.N. Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, which has supported the ICC investigation.

A panel of three judges is set to determine whether there are “reasonable grounds” to conclude that Min Aung Hlaing is criminally responsible for the deportation and persecution of the Rohingya in Myanmar and Bangladesh.

While there is no specific timeline for their decision, it typically takes about three months to issue a ruling on a warrant.

This action by the ICC prosecutor comes amid significant political pressure from Washington and other entities regarding the arrest warrant issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense chief, Yoav Gallant.

The prosecutor’s office indicated that the warrant request follows thorough, independent, and impartial investigations. They also noted that additional applications for arrest warrants related to Myanmar are forthcoming.

Although Myanmar is not a signatory to the treaty establishing the ICC, judges ruled in 2018 and 2019 that the court has jurisdiction over alleged cross-border crimes that occurred in neighboring Bangladesh, an ICC member state, allowing prosecutors to initiate a formal investigation.

“This marks the first request for an arrest warrant against a senior official of the Myanmar government that my Office is submitting. More will follow,” stated the ICC prosecutor.

FIVE-YEAR INVESTIGATION

The ICC has been conducting an investigation into crimes against the Rohingya for nearly five years. This investigation has faced challenges due to limited access to Myanmar and the ongoing turmoil following the military’s ousting of the democratically elected government led by Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi in 2021, which ignited a resistance movement that transitioned from peaceful protests to armed conflict on various fronts.

Investigators have relied on witness testimonies, including accounts from insiders, as well as documentary evidence and verified scientific, photographic, and video materials.

The ICC prosecutor’s move to pursue a warrant against Sr. Gen. Min Aung Hlaing coincides with a resurgence of atrocities against Rohingya civilians reminiscent of those experienced seven years prior, stated Maria Elena Vignoli, senior international justice counsel at Human Rights Watch.

“The ICC’s initiative represents a significant advancement in disrupting the ongoing cycle of abuse and impunity that has historically contributed to the military’s widespread violations,” she added.

Comprising 124 member nations, the ICC is tasked with prosecuting individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression. Lacking its own police force for arrests, it depends on member states for enforcement. Securing the custody of Min Aung Hlaing poses a challenge, as he refrains from international travel.

Major global powers, including the United States, Russia, China, and India, have not ratified the ICC. However, it enjoys support from the entire European Union, Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Japan, and numerous countries across Africa and Latin America.

The ICC has issued multiple arrest warrants for current national leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir. To date, only one sitting head of state, Kenya’s Uhuru Kenyatta, who faced charges from the ICC prior to his election as president in 2013, has appeared in court, although the case was subsequently dismissed.

Russia has warned the U.S. about a potential “spiral of escalation” but remains committed to open communication

0
Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Sergei Ryabkov

Russia issued a warning to the United States on Wednesday, urging it to cease what it termed a “spiral of escalation” regarding Ukraine. However, the country indicated it would continue to notify Washington about missile test launches to prevent “dangerous mistakes.”

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov’s remarks highlighted Moscow’s desire to maintain open lines of communication amid heightened tensions with the U.S., particularly following the recent approval of a new policy that lowers the threshold for nuclear weapon use.

Ryabkov’s comments came shortly after Russia conducted a test of the Oreshnik, a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile, aimed at Ukraine. He asserted that this action conveyed a clear message to Western nations.

“The message is unmistakable: stop this behavior immediately. You must not provide Kyiv with everything it requests, nor should you encourage them to pursue further military actions, as they pose significant risks,” Ryabkov was quoted as saying by state media.

He further emphasized that the current U.S. administration needs to halt this escalation, warning that failure to do so could lead to a perilous situation for all parties involved, including the United States.

President Vladimir Putin stated last week that the launch of the Oreshnik was a response to Ukraine’s initial deployment of U.S. ATACMS ballistic missiles and British Storm Shadow cruise missiles against Russian territory, actions taken with Western approval.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy characterized Russia’s deployment of the new missile, which Kyiv claimed could reach speeds of 13,600 kph (8,450 mph), as “a clear and severe escalation” of the conflict, calling for strong international condemnation.

The U.S. military described the missile as experimental, suggesting that Russia likely has only a limited number of them.

The Kremlin noted that Russia was not technically required to notify the United States about the Oreshnik launch, as it was classified as an intermediate-range missile rather than an intercontinental one. Nevertheless, Moscow chose to inform the U.S. 30 minutes prior to the launch.

Ryabkov emphasized the importance of a stabilizing factor in the precarious situation we currently face, stating, “We are dedicated to this practice and hope the United States will share this commitment.” He added that such measures could mitigate the risks of miscalculations or dangerous errors.

In a related update on Wednesday, the Russian state news agency TASS reported that an official confirmed Moscow’s ongoing efforts to operationalize its Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile, which is a key component of its strategic nuclear capabilities.

The Sarmat missile is engineered to deliver nuclear warheads to targets located thousands of miles away, including the United States and Europe. However, its development has encountered numerous delays and testing challenges. In September, arms experts indicated that Russia may have experienced a significant failure during the missile’s most recent test, resulting in a substantial crater at the launch site.

Russia reports that Ukraine has conducted two additional strikes using ATACMS missiles

0
US-supplied ATACMS missiles are fired from an undisclosed location in Ukraine in footage posted by a Telegram channel affiliated with the Ukrainian military.

Russia announced on Tuesday that it would take retaliatory measures following Ukraine‘s attacks on Russian military facilities using US-supplied weaponry. This comes after President Vladimir Putin had cautioned Kyiv and Western nations against such missile strikes.

In recent days, both Moscow and Kyiv have intensified their aerial assaults, employing increasingly advanced weaponry, raising concerns about a potential escalation of the conflict.

Ukraine launched its first US-made ATACMS missiles at Russia last week after receiving approval from Washington, prompting the Kremlin to respond with an experimental hypersonic missile that struck the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

The Russian defense ministry reported that Ukraine’s recent ATACMS attacks on November 23 and 25 targeted military sites and an airfield in Russia’s western Kursk region, resulting in some damage to the infrastructure.

“Preparations for retaliatory actions are underway,” the ministry stated.

In a significant escalation, Russian forces conducted a record attack involving 188 drones against Ukraine overnight, disrupting energy supplies in the eastern part of the country, according to Kyiv’s reports on Tuesday.

Russia acknowledged ‘casualties’

The ATACMS strike on the Kursk Vostochny air base resulted in injuries to two servicemen, marking a rare admission from Moscow’s defense ministry. Additionally, a strike on an air defense battery damaged a radar system and also resulted in “casualties.”

The ministry noted that three of the five missiles launched in the initial strike were intercepted, while seven of the eight missiles used in the subsequent attack were also destroyed.

In retaliation for Ukraine’s initial use of the US-supplied weapon, Moscow deployed its new Oreshnik experimental hypersonic missile on Thursday, which Putin suggested could potentially carry a nuclear payload.

He cautioned that Russia might persist in utilizing the weapon based on “the actions of the United States and its allies,” asserting that Moscow reserves the right to target military installations in nations that permit Ukraine to employ their weaponry against Russia.

Moscow’s remarks regarding the recent strike, along with its extensive drone assault, coincided with a scheduled meeting of ambassadors from Ukraine and NATO’s 32 member states in Brussels, following last week’s launch of an intermediate-range missile by Russia.

This meeting was set to occur shortly after Ukraine’s air force reported the downing of 76 Russian drones across 17 regions, with an additional 95 either lost from radar or neutralized by electronic jamming systems. The fate of the remaining drones was not detailed.

President Volodymyr Zelensky responded by stating, “These attacks are feasible only due to Russia’s capacity to evade sanctions through various methods.” He emphasized the need for enhanced collective action to enforce sanctions and compel Russia to cease its aggression.

AFP reporters noted the sound of explosions over the capital during the assault, while in the relatively unscathed western Ternopil region, officials indicated that the drones had caused damage to a “critical infrastructure facility,” without providing further details.

Authorities reported that the attack disrupted electricity supplies in the area, and engineers were actively working to restore stability.

Kyiv expressed hopes for “concrete and meaningful outcomes” from the NATO-Ukraine Council meeting. However, diplomats and officials within NATO have tempered expectations regarding significant results from the discussions scheduled for Tuesday afternoon at the alliance’s headquarters in Brussels.

The most anticipated outcome is a reaffirmation of NATO’s previous stance that Russia’s introduction of new weaponry will not “deter NATO allies from supporting Ukraine.”

Russian forces make progress

A NATO official stated that the meeting “offers a chance to address the current security landscape in Ukraine and will feature briefings from Ukrainian officials through video link.”

The Kremlin has downplayed the meeting, suggesting that it is improbable that any substantial decisions will emerge from it.

On the front lines, Ukraine’s weary soldiers are finding it challenging to counter the advances of Russian forces in the eastern part of the country.

On Tuesday, Russia announced that its troops had taken control of another village in the Kharkiv region, an area where the front line had remained relatively stable until recently.

Moscow’s defense ministry reported that its units had “liberated” the settlement of Kopanky, a village located near the Ukrainian-controlled city of Kupiansk, which had been seized by Russian forces at the beginning of the 2022 offensive before being recaptured by Ukraine later that year.

In the occupied Kherson region, officials appointed by Moscow reported that Ukrainian forces targeted a bus in the Russian-held town of Nova Kakhovka on Tuesday, resulting in four fatalities and at least seven injuries.

Russian senator Matvienko claims Russia can develop advanced “superweapons”

0
Chairperson of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation, Valentina Matvienko.

Russia possesses the capability, including advanced “superweapons,” to adequately respond to any acts of aggression directed at the nation, according to Federation Council chairwoman Valentina Matvienko.

During a Senate meeting on Wednesday, Matvienko addressed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent address to the nation, which included the deployment of the new Oreshnik hypersonic ballistic missile against a military target in Ukraine last week. The president emphasized that Moscow retains the right to retaliate against countries that permit Ukraine to utilize Western-supplied weaponry against Russia, clarifying that the Oreshnik’s deployment was a reaction to the “aggressive actions of NATO members” supporting Ukraine.

Matvienko characterized this action as a “significant act of modern geopolitics” and a “strong signal” that has been acknowledged by all relevant parties. However, she emphasized that the use of the Oreshnik should not be misconstrued as an ultimatum or a threat, as suggested by Western media.

“This is our response to the escalating tensions instigated by the West and the actions that have resulted in attacks on Russian facilities using long-range weaponry. We caution that this behavior is unacceptable,” Matvienko stated, adding that the missile’s deployment serves as a “demonstration of our readiness for any eventuality and our possession of the means, including superweapons, to deliver a decisive and unavoidable response.” The chairwoman did not specify which “superweapons” she was alluding to.

“As the president indicated, there will always be a response,” Matvienko concluded.

Matvienko indicated that Putin’s address and the introduction of the Oreshnik missile could significantly influence the decision to pursue a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict, emphasizing the need for unconditional respect for Russia’s interests, security, and sovereignty.

She expressed optimism that Western leaders would recognize the implications of recent events, urging them to acknowledge their failures in containing Russia’s progress and in achieving a geopolitical defeat. She called for them to engage in negotiations on a broad array of issues, warning that failure to do so would result in a stalemate.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov remarked that a political and diplomatic resolution to the Ukraine conflict remains distant due to ongoing battlefield conditions.

He pointed out that the West continues to be fixated on the notion of delivering a strategic defeat to Russia, cautioning that Moscow will retaliate against Ukraine’s recent assaults on its internationally recognized territories with long-range missiles supplied by the West.

Lavrov says Ukraine resolution still a considerable distance away

0
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov addresses the 79th United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has indicated that achieving a diplomatic resolution to the Ukraine conflict remains a distant prospect, attributing the ongoing delay to the West’s persistent escalation.

In an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta on Wednesday, Lavrov remarked, “Based on the current situation on the battlefield, we are far from reaching a political and diplomatic resolution to the crisis. The United States and its allies seem fixated on the notion of delivering a strategic defeat to Russia, and they are willing to go to great lengths to pursue this misguided objective.”

He described the recent endorsement by the US, UK, and France for long-range strikes on internationally recognized Russian territory by Ukraine as “another escalatory step” taken by the West. “Our repeated warnings that such unacceptable actions would provoke a suitable response were disregarded,” he stated.

Lavrov emphasized that Russian President Vladimir Putin had “clearly articulated how Russia would react to these provocations” during his televised address on Thursday, which followed the deployment of Moscow’s new Oreshnik medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile against a Ukrainian military-industrial site.

The minister expressed his belief that those accountable for harming Russian citizens and infrastructure will face appropriate consequences. He emphasized that no escalation from our adversary will deter us from fulfilling the objectives of the military operation in Ukraine. We are prepared for any developments, yet we consistently favor resolving disputes through diplomatic means.

To achieve a diplomatic resolution between Russia and Ukraine, it is crucial to address the fundamental causes of the conflict, he stated. Lavrov identified NATO’s expansion to the east and the ongoing violations of the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine by the Kiev government as significant factors.

He further noted that a key component of any political resolution must include the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, ensuring that the territories under the control of the Kiev regime maintain a non-aligned, neutral, and non-nuclear status.

Lavrov also asserted that a peace agreement cannot be established without acknowledging the political and territorial realities outlined in the Russian constitution, specifically referencing the status of Crimea, which rejoined Russia in 2014, as well as the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics and the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, which became part of Russia following referendums in 2022.

Trump team is considering direct talks with North Korea’s Kim as part of a renewed diplomatic effort, sources say

0
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and U.S. then-President Donald Trump shake hands over the military demarcation line between North and South Korea on June 30, 2019.

President-elect Donald Trump‘s team is exploring the possibility of initiating direct discussions with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, aiming to reduce the potential for military conflict through renewed diplomatic efforts, as reported by two individuals familiar with the situation.

Members of Trump’s team believe that a direct engagement from Trump could effectively leverage the existing relationship, which has seen both leaders exchange insults and what Trump referred to as “beautiful” letters during an unprecedented diplomatic initiative in his first term. This approach is viewed as the most promising way to establish rapport with Kim after years of tension, according to the sources.

The discussions regarding policy are ongoing, and no definitive decisions have been reached by the president-elect, the sources indicated. Trump’s transition team has not provided any comments on the matter.

It remains uncertain what concessions Kim might extend to Trump. The North Korean leadership previously dismissed four years of outreach from U.S. President Joe Biden aimed at initiating talks without preconditions. Kim appears to be fortified by an enhanced missile arsenal and a strengthened alliance with Russia.

In a recent address at a military exhibition in Pyongyang, Kim stated, “We have already gone as far as we can on negotiating with the United States,” as reported by state media.

During his presidency from 2017 to 2021, Trump engaged in three summits with Kim in Singapore, Hanoi, and at the Korean border, marking the first occasion a sitting U.S. president visited North Korea.

Despite the high-profile diplomacy, the meetings did not yield tangible outcomes, even as Trump characterized their interactions as falling “in love.” The U.S. has insisted on North Korea’s denuclearization, while Kim has sought complete relief from sanctions, subsequently issuing new threats.

The outcome of a new diplomatic initiative remains uncertain. Initially, Trump aims to restore fundamental engagement, but specific policy objectives or a detailed timeline have yet to be established, according to sources. Additionally, this issue may be overshadowed by more urgent foreign policy challenges in the Middle East and Ukraine, as noted by an individual familiar with the transition’s perspective.

North Korean state media have not acknowledged Trump’s re-election, while Kim recently stated that the United States is escalating tensions and provocations, heightening the risk of nuclear conflict.

Trump and some of his associates left office believing that a direct approach was the most effective way for Washington to influence actions north of the demilitarized zone, which has separated the Korean Peninsula for seventy years. The Korean War was never formally concluded, despite the cessation of hostilities.

On Friday, Trump appointed Alex Wong, a former State Department official who played a key role in the initial North Korea strategy, as his deputy national security adviser. “As Deputy Special Representative for North Korea, he assisted in negotiating my summit with North Korean Leader, Kim Jong Un,” Trump stated.

ESCALATING TENSIONS

As Trump returns to the White House in January, he faces a more volatile situation with Kim, reminiscent of his first term in 2017, a scenario that allies anticipate he will address directly.

“My experience with President Trump suggests he is more inclined to pursue direct engagement,” remarked U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty, a Trump supporter, in a recent interview with Reuters. “I am hopeful that we can witness an improvement in relations and possibly a shift in Kim Jong Un’s stance if dialogue is resumed.”

Washington has a range of concerns regarding North Korea’s expanding nuclear arsenal and missile capabilities, its increasingly aggressive rhetoric towards South Korea, and its close ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The Biden administration is expected to address several key topics during transition briefings for Trump aides, as indicated by a U.S. official. However, the Trump team has not yet finalized transition agreements, which may restrict the breadth of these discussions. The White House has not provided any comments on this matter.

A significant concern in Washington is the potential for enhanced collaboration between Russia and North Korea regarding nuclear or missile technology, as well as the possibility of thousands of North Korean troops being deployed to Russia to assist in the conflict in Ukraine.

On Monday, Reuters reported that North Korea is expanding a critical weapons manufacturing facility that produces a specific type of short-range missile utilized by Russia in Ukraine, based on satellite imagery analyzed by researchers from a U.S.-based think tank.

U.S. officials have expressed that these developments heighten the risk of conflict involving multiple nuclear-armed nations in Europe or Asia, including the United States and its allies, such as South Korea and Japan.

American military forces are stationed throughout the region to deter North Korean aggression, and Trump has emphasized the need for U.S. allies to contribute more financially to these deployments.

During his final meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping earlier this month in Peru, Biden urged China to leverage its influence to manage North Korea’s actions.

However, the potential for collaboration between China and the U.S. may be constrained, as Trump has pledged significant tariffs on Chinese imports and is surrounding himself with advisors who take a hardline stance on China, including Marco Rubio as secretary of state and Representative Mike Waltz as national security adviser.

Last month, Trump claimed that the two nations were on the brink of “a nuclear war with millions of people killed,” but he asserted that he had averted it due to his relationship with North Korea’s leader.

Israel-Hezbollah truce comes into effect

0
An Israeli tank maneuvers, amid cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel, by Israel's border with Lebanon in northern Israel.

A ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-aligned group Hezbollah was implemented at 0200 GMT on Wednesday, following U.S. President Joe Biden’s announcement that both parties had agreed to a deal facilitated by the United States and France.

After the ceasefire commenced, gunfire echoed throughout Beirut, though it was unclear whether it was celebratory or a means of alerting residents who may have missed evacuation notices from the Israeli military.

Vehicles filled with individuals displaced from southern Lebanon due to recent Israeli airstrikes began returning to their homes following the ceasefire. This agreement aims to halt a conflict along the Israeli-Lebanese border that has resulted in thousands of casualties since it was sparked by the Gaza war last year.

On Tuesday, Biden addressed the nation from the White House shortly after Israel’s security cabinet voted 10-1 in favor of the agreement. He mentioned discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati, confirming that hostilities would cease at 4 a.m. local time (0200 GMT).

“This is intended to be a lasting end to hostilities,” Biden stated. “What remains of Hezbollah and other terrorist groups will not be permitted to jeopardize Israel’s security again.”

Biden also noted that Israel would begin a phased withdrawal of its forces over the next 60 days, allowing the Lebanese army to secure the area near the border to prevent Hezbollah from reestablishing its infrastructure there.

Civilians from both sides are expected to safely return to their communities soon, he stated.

Hezbollah has not officially responded to the ceasefire; however, senior official Hassan Fadlallah mentioned in an interview with Lebanon’s Al Jadeed TV that while the group supports the expansion of the Lebanese state’s authority, it anticipates emerging from the conflict even stronger.

“Thousands will rally to the resistance… The proposal to disarm the resistance was an Israeli initiative that ultimately failed,” Fadlallah, who also serves as a member of Lebanon’s parliament, remarked.

Iran, a supporter of Hezbollah, the Palestinian group Hamas, and the Houthi rebels attacking Israel from Yemen, expressed its approval of the ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron announced on the social media platform X that the agreement was “the result of months of efforts with the Israeli and Lebanese authorities, in close cooperation with the United States.”

Lebanon’s Prime Minister Mikati released a statement in favor of the agreement. Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib indicated that the Lebanese army would deploy at least 5,000 troops in southern Lebanon as Israeli forces withdrew.

Netanyahu expressed his readiness to enforce a ceasefire but warned of a strong response to any violations by Hezbollah.

He noted that the ceasefire would enable Israel to concentrate on the threat posed by Iran, provide the military with a chance to rest and resupply, and isolate Hamas, the militant group that instigated the regional conflict with its attack on Israel from Gaza last year.

In complete alignment with the United States, we maintain full military operational freedom. If Hezbollah breaches the agreement or seeks to rearm, we will respond with decisive force, Netanyahu stated.

Hezbollah, which has ties to Hamas, is significantly diminished compared to its strength at the onset of the conflict, he noted.

“We have effectively reverted its capabilities by decades, eliminated many of its senior leaders, destroyed the majority of its rockets and missiles, neutralized thousands of its fighters, and dismantled years of terror infrastructure along our border,” he remarked.

A senior U.S. official, speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity, indicated that the U.S. and France would collaborate with the UNIFIL peacekeeping force to establish a mechanism that would work alongside Lebanon’s military to prevent potential ceasefire violations. The official clarified that U.S. combat troops would not be deployed.

Jon Finer, deputy national security adviser in the Biden administration, informed CNN that the U.S. would closely monitor any breaches of the agreement.

“The successful implementation of this agreement is crucial, and we will remain vigilant against any attempts to undermine the commitments made by both parties in this process today,” he stated.

Biden, who is set to leave office in January, expressed that his administration would persist in advocating for a challenging ceasefire and hostage-release agreement in Gaza, as well as for a normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia.

In the hours preceding the ceasefire, intense fighting continued as Israel intensified its airstrike campaign in Beirut and various regions of Lebanon, resulting in reports of at least 18 fatalities from health authorities.

The Israeli military announced that it targeted “elements of Hezbollah’s financial management and systems,” which included a money-exchange office. Meanwhile, Hezbollah maintained its rocket attacks into Israel.

According to the military, Israel’s air force intercepted three rockets launched from Lebanese territory during a significant missile barrage on Tuesday night, triggering warning alarms in approximately 115 settlements.

Alia Ibrahim, a mother of twin girls from the southern village of Qaaqaiyat al-Snawbar, who had evacuated to Beirut nearly three months ago, expressed her hope that Israeli officials, who have shown mixed signals regarding a ceasefire, would honor the agreement.

“Our village – they destroyed half of it. In these few seconds before they announced the ceasefire, they destroyed half our village,” she stated. “God willing, we can return to our homes and our land.”

A survey conducted by Israel’s Channel 12 TV revealed that 37% of Israelis supported the ceasefire, while 32% opposed it. Those against the agreement include opposition leaders and mayors of towns near the Israeli-Lebanese border, who advocate for a depopulated buffer zone on the Lebanese side.

Both the Lebanese government and Hezbollah have emphasized that the return of displaced civilians to southern Lebanon is a fundamental aspect of the truce.

Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, a right-wing member of Netanyahu’s administration, remarked on X that the agreement did not guarantee the return of Israelis to their homes in the northern part of the country and that the Lebanese army lacked the capability to confront Hezbollah. “To leave Lebanon, we must establish our own security buffer,” Ben-Gvir stated.

Italy seeks to prevent the arrest warrant for Netanyahu, according to reports

0
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Italy is advocating for the suspension of the arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as reported by Italian media outlets.

As a signatory to the Rome Statute, Italy is obligated to comply with ICC rulings.

Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani is said to have proposed this initiative during a G7 Foreign Ministers’ meeting held in Italy, which commenced on Monday. He urged the G7 nations to reach a consensus, suggesting that the criminal proceedings could be paused until the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to the newspaper Il Messaggero.

The ICC, based in The Hague, announced on Thursday that it had issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim al-Masri, citing alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the Gaza conflict. The court holds jurisdiction over the West Bank and Gaza, recognized as occupied Palestinian territories under international law.

If they travel to any of the 124 countries that are signatories to the ICC’s Rome Statute, including Italy, both Israeli officials could face arrest.

However, Tajani emphasized that while the ICC makes “legal decisions,” it is up to Western governments to make “political choices.”

“We need to be united on this,” Tajani reportedly stated during the G7 discussions.

As reported by the news website Euractiv, Tajani reiterated Italy’s commitment to the ICC. Nevertheless, when questioned about the possibility of Netanyahu’s arrest should he visit Italy, he pointed out that high-ranking state officials enjoy a certain level of immunity.

Countries such as Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, the UK, and Norway have indicated their intention to comply with the ICC warrant, while the US and Israel have denounced the decision.

Russian jets intercepted US bombers in the vicinity of Kaliningrad on Monday

0
B-52 Stratofortress

Two B-52 Stratofortress bombers from the United States were intercepted by two Russian SU-27 fighter jets near Kaliningrad, Russia’s exclave on the Baltic Sea, on Monday, according to a U.S. official on Tuesday.

The U.S. bombers were conducting training exercises in the Baltic Sea region alongside their NATO ally, Finland, which shares a 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia. This training occurs amid rising tensions due to Western support for Ukraine in its efforts to counter Russia’s invasion.

The interception of the U.S. bombers by Russian jets took place shortly after Russia launched a hypersonic intermediate-range ballistic missile at Ukraine last Thursday, a response to the U.S. and Britain’s decision to permit Kyiv to target Russian territory with advanced Western weaponry.

The U.S. bombers maintained their pre-planned flight paths during what was characterized as a safe and professional intercept by the Russian SU-27s, as reported by the U.S. official to Reuters.

On the same day, the U.S. B-52s conducted operations alongside Finnish F/A-18Cs during a joint U.S.-Finnish exercise in Finnish airspace.

The Finnish Air Force confirmed in an email to Reuters that its fighter jets and the U.S. bombers participated in a training mission on Monday aimed at enhancing Finland’s defense capabilities.

While the Finnish Air Force’s statement did not mention the Russian interception, it noted that the drill included “simulated air-to-ground drops [to] demonstrate our ability to work together in fire-use missions,” emphasizing that this cooperation also bolstered NATO’s collective defense and deterrence in the northern region.

In a significant shift from its historical stance of military non-alignment, Finland joined NATO in 2023 as a direct reaction to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Having successfully resisted a Soviet invasion attempt during World War II, Finland has emerged as one of Europe’s most steadfast supporters of Ukraine in its struggle against Russian aggression.

Moscow is formulating a response to the ATACMS strikes from Kiev

0
Air-launched long-range Storm Shadow/SCALP cruise missile, manufactured by MBDA, pictured at the 54th International Paris Air Show at Le Bourget Airport near Paris, France.

Russia is formulating a response to the recent Ukrainian ATACMS strikes on the Kursk Region, as stated by the Russian Defense Ministry on Tuesday. This development follows US President Joe Biden‘s decision to permit Ukraine to utilize US-supplied long-range missiles against targets within Russia‘s internationally recognized borders.

In a formal announcement via Telegram, the Russian Defense Ministry indicated that Ukrainian forces had executed two long-range attacks on the Kursk Region over the past three days, employing Western armaments.

On November 23, Ukraine reportedly launched five long-range ATACMS missiles at the village of Lotaryovka, situated approximately 37 kilometers northwest of Kursk, aiming at an S-400 anti-aircraft missile division. This assault resulted in three casualties and inflicted damage on the radar system, according to the ministry’s report.

Furthermore, on November 25, Ukraine fired an additional eight ATACMS at the Kursk-Vostochny airfield, located near the village of Khalino. Seven of these missiles were intercepted by the S-400 missile defense system and the Pantsir air defense system. However, one missile successfully struck its target, injuring two servicemen and causing minor damage to facilities, as reported.

The ministry emphasized that inspections of the affected areas have “reliably confirmed” the use of US-supplied ATACMS missiles by Ukrainian forces. Additionally, the ministry released several images purportedly showing the remnants of the US-made missiles.

The report concluded by stating that the Russian Ministry of Defense is closely monitoring the situation and preparing appropriate response measures.

In response to Biden’s authorization for Ukraine to deploy ATACMS, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the deployment of the new hypersonic Oreshnik ballistic missile. This advanced weapon, capable of carrying nuclear warheads, was reportedly utilized against a Ukrainian military industrial facility in Dnepropetrovsk.

Putin characterized the strike as a “combat test” of advanced weaponry and cautioned that such “tests” would persist based on the situation. He emphasized that Russia would respond “decisively and in a reciprocal manner” to any further escalation of aggressive actions from Kiev and its foreign supporters.