Friday, June 5, 2026
Home Blog Page 145

Diplomats have created channels for India and China to address Himalayan border tensions, says India’s army chief

0

Discussions between Indian and Chinese diplomats have created potential pathways for the two Asian nations to address the ongoing conflict along their Himalayan border, stated India’s army chief on Tuesday.

Relations between the nuclear-capable neighbors have been tense since violent confrontations in 2020 resulted in the deaths of 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers along the largely undefined border.

Efforts to resolve the standoff through diplomatic and military channels have progressed slowly, adversely affecting business interactions between the two most populous countries, with New Delhi increasing scrutiny of Chinese investments and suspending significant projects.

“The diplomatic side is showing positive signals,” General Upendra Dwivedi remarked at a defense think tank event. “However, the implementation on the ground relies on the military leaders from both sides to make those decisions.”

Dwivedi emphasized that India seeks to restore the status of the western Himalayan frontier to its condition prior to April 2020, when the standoff commenced, noting that the situation will remain delicate until that occurs.

The military forces have withdrawn from four out of six confrontation sites, yet they have not achieved a resolution on the remaining contentious areas. According to Dwivedi, the parties have addressed the more straightforward issues and must now tackle the more complex challenges.

These remarks from the Indian army chief came after recent discussions between India’s National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Jaishankar noted last month that approximately 75% of the disengagement issues along the border with China have been resolved.

Following Doval’s meeting with Wang in Russia last month, both nations also committed to intensifying their efforts to ensure complete disengagement.

Israel has long record of military invasions in Lebanon

0

Israel has been involved in border conflicts with Lebanon’s Iran-supported Hezbollah for a year, coinciding with the ongoing situation in Gaza. The country has a longstanding record of military operations and invasions in Lebanon. Following the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in recent airstrikes in Beirut, Israel has signaled its intention to launch a comprehensive invasion of Lebanon to secure the border area for its citizens who have been displaced by the violence.

Here is an overview of Israel’s military actions in Lebanon:

1948

Lebanon joins other Arab nations in opposing the newly established state of Israel. Approximately 100,000 Palestinians, who either fled or were expelled from British-controlled Palestine during the conflict, seek refuge in Lebanon. An armistice is reached between Lebanon and Israel in 1949.

1968

In retaliation for an attack on an Israeli airliner by Palestinian militants, Israeli commandos destroy several passenger planes at Beirut airport. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) moves to Lebanon two years later after being expelled from Jordan, resulting in increased cross-border tensions.

1973

Israeli special forces, disguised, kill three Palestinian guerrilla leaders in Beirut as revenge for the murder of Israeli athletes during the 1972 Munich Olympics. Throughout the 1970s, Palestinian guerrilla attacks on Israel and subsequent Israeli military responses in Lebanon escalate, prompting many Lebanese to flee the southern region and exacerbating sectarian strife as civil war looms.

1978

Israel conducts an invasion of southern Lebanon, establishing a limited occupation zone in response to a militant attack near Tel Aviv targeting Palestinian guerrillas. The Israeli military supports a local Christian militia known as the South Lebanon Army (SLA).

1982

Israel escalates its military campaign by invading Lebanon up to Beirut, following a series of retaliatory border exchanges. After a protracted and violent 10-week siege characterized by intense Israeli bombardment of West Beirut, thousands of Palestinian fighters are evacuated by sea. Tragically, hundreds of civilians in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila are killed by Christian militias, who were permitted entry by Israeli forces after the assassination of Lebanon’s newly elected Maronite Catholic president via a car bomb. In response to the invasion, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards form the Shi’ite Muslim militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon.

1985

After withdrawing from central Lebanon in 1983, Israel maintains a military presence in the south, creating a formal occupation zone approximately 15 kilometers (nine miles) deep, which it controls in collaboration with the SLA. Hezbollah initiates a guerrilla campaign against Israeli troops.

1993

In July, Israel initiates “Operation Accountability,” a week-long military operation targeting Lebanon. The stated objective is to directly confront Hezbollah, complicating the group’s ability to utilize southern Lebanon as a launch point for attacks on Israel, while also exerting pressure on the Lebanese government to take action against Hezbollah.

1996

Hezbollah frequently launched attacks on Israeli forces in the southern region and fired rockets into northern Israel, prompting Israel to initiate a 17-day military operation known as “Operation Grapes of Wrath.” This offensive resulted in the deaths of over 200 individuals in Lebanon, including 102 casualties from an Israeli strike on a U.N. base in the village of Qana.

2000

Israel completed its withdrawal from southern Lebanon, concluding a 22-year occupation, following persistent assaults by Hezbollah on Israeli military positions within the occupied territory.

2006

In July, Hezbollah infiltrated Israel, abducting two Israeli soldiers and killing others, which ignited a five-week conflict characterized by extensive Israeli airstrikes targeting Hezbollah strongholds and national infrastructure. Although Israeli ground forces advanced into southern Lebanon, the majority of the fighting was conducted through airstrikes and rocket fire. The conflict concluded without Israel meeting its military goals, while Hezbollah proclaimed a “divine victory.” The toll included at least 1,200 Lebanese, primarily civilians, and 158 Israelis, mostly soldiers.

2024

On October 1, the Israeli military announced the commencement of “limited, localized, and targeted ground raids based on precise intelligence” against Hezbollah forces in southern Lebanese villages near the border, which were deemed to pose “an immediate threat to Israeli communities in northern Israel.” The operation was supported by air force and artillery units executing “precise strikes.”

Putin has authorized the conscription of 133,000 new servicemen

0
Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting

Russian President Vladimir Putin has authorized the conscription of 133,000 new servicemen as part of the autumn draft, which is set to commence on October 1 and continue until the end of the year, as outlined in a decree released by the Kremlin on Monday.

The decree, which appeared in the state-run newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta, specifies that the draft will target citizens aged 18 to 30 who are not in the reserve and are eligible for conscription under Federal Law, totaling 133,000 individuals.

Vice-Admiral Vladimir Tsimlyansky, head of Russia’s conscription office, confirmed that the duration of service for conscripts will remain unchanged at 12 months within military units in Russia.

Tsimlyansky also emphasized that conscripts will not be deployed to participate in the special military operation in the newly annexed regions, as reported by Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

Russia refers to its ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which escalated with a full-scale invasion in February 2022, as a special military operation, while Kyiv and its allies characterize it as an unprovoked and imperialistic land grab.

In a decision widely criticized by much of the Western world, Russia annexed portions of southeastern Ukraine in late 2022, referring to these areas as ‘new regions.’ In response to perceived escalating threats along its western borders, President Putin ordered an increase in the Russian military by 180,000 troops in September, raising the total to 1.5 million active personnel, which would position it as the second largest military globally, following China.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, U.S. President Joe Biden, and other NATO leaders have held Putin accountable as the primary aggressor in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and as a source of threats to neighboring countries.

 

Ukraine’s defense minister dismisses three deputies

0
Ukrainian Defence Minister Rustem Umerov

Ukraine‘s defense minister announced the dismissal of three deputy ministers in a cabinet reshuffle aimed at strengthening the country’s response to Moscow’s ongoing invasion, which has persisted for two and a half years.

Rustem Umerov shared this information via social media on Tuesday, stating that he has requested the government to relieve Stanislav Haider, Oleksandr Serhiy, and Yuriy Dzhygyr from their roles as deputy defense ministers, along with Liudmyla Darahan, who served as the ministry’s secretary.

Umerov emphasized the importance of collaborating closely with law enforcement and anti-corruption agencies to effectively reform the procurement system.

He indicated that new appointments would be announced soon. In light of Russia’s extensive military actions, Ukrainian officials are actively working to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies and combat corruption.

Chinese military carried out combat readiness patrols in South China Sea

0

The Chinese military carried out combat readiness patrols in certain areas of the South China Sea from Monday to Tuesday, as reported by state media. This activity follows a series of uncommon military drills and exercises that took place over the weekend.

According to reports, the Southern Theater Command of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) engaged in these patrols to enhance combat readiness and ensure peace and stability in the South China Sea region.

China asserts sovereignty over nearly the entire South China Sea, despite competing claims from Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague determined that China’s claims lacked a basis in international law, a ruling that Beijing has dismissed.

On Saturday, Chinese air and naval forces conducted operations near the contested Scarborough Shoal, coinciding with announcements from Australia and the Philippines regarding joint military exercises with Japan, New Zealand, and the United States in the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

The shoal, located approximately 200 km (124 miles) west of Luzon, the principal island of the Philippines, falls within the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone and has been a point of contention between Beijing and Manila for an extended period.

During recent discussions in New York with China’s chief diplomat, Wang Yi, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken expressed concerns regarding China’s “dangerous and destabilizing actions” in the South China Sea.

Blinken has previously criticized Beijing for its assertive movements involving coast guard and fishing vessels, which are believed to function as a maritime militia in the region.

Israel initiates ground operations in Lebanon, conducting ‘limited’ strikes against Hezbollah

0
Israeli Army tank is transported, amid cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel, in northern Israel.

Israel’s anticipated ground invasion of Lebanon appeared to commence early Tuesday, as the military announced that troops had initiated “limited” operations targeting Hezbollah positions in the border region.

In a statement, the military indicated that it had launched “limited, localized, and targeted ground raids based on precise intelligence” against Hezbollah in southern Lebanese villages near the border, which were deemed to pose “an immediate threat to Israeli communities in northern Israel.”

Support for the ground forces was provided by the air force and artillery through “precise strikes.” Residents in the Lebanese border town of Aita al-Shaab reported intense shelling, accompanied by the sounds of helicopters and drones in the sky. Flares were frequently deployed over the Lebanese town of Rmeish, illuminating the night.

On Monday, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant informed local council leaders in northern Israel that the next phase of the conflict along Lebanon’s southern border would soon commence, aimed at facilitating the return of Israelis who have sought refuge from Hezbollah rocket attacks during nearly a year of border hostilities.

The ground invasion signifies a deepening conflict in the Middle East involving Israel and Iran-aligned militants, ignited by an attack on Israel by the Palestinian militant group Hamas on October 7, 2023. This situation now poses a risk of drawing in both the United States and Iran.

On Tuesday morning, an Israeli airstrike in Lebanon targeted Mounir Maqdah, the commander of the Lebanese faction of the Palestinian Fatah movement’s military wing, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, as reported by two Palestinian security officials. His current status remains unclear.

The strike occurred in a building within the densely populated Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian refugee camp, located near the southern city of Sidon. This incident marks the first attack on the camp, which is the largest Palestinian camp in Lebanon, since hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel escalated nearly a year ago.

In Syria, an Israeli airstrike in the capital, Damascus, resulted in the deaths of three civilians and injuries to nine others, according to Syrian state media citing a military source. The Israeli military has stated that it does not comment on reports from foreign media.

Israel has conducted strikes on Iran-affiliated sites in Syria for several years, but has intensified these operations following the Hamas attack on its southern region on October 7, 2023. According to Israeli reports, Hamas’s assault resulted in the deaths of 1,200 individuals and the abduction of approximately 250 hostages.

In retaliation, Israel initiated a significant military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, leading to widespread destruction across much of the Palestinian territory, displacing the majority of its 2.3 million residents, and resulting in over 41,300 Palestinian fatalities, as reported by the Gaza health ministry.

Israel’s ground offensive in Lebanon follows a series of significant military actions, including the lethal detonation of booby-trapped Hezbollah pagers, two weeks of airstrikes, and the recent killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, which has severely impacted the group.

The extensive airstrikes have resulted in the deaths of numerous Hezbollah commanders, but have also claimed the lives of approximately 1,000 civilians and displaced one million people, as reported by the Lebanese government.

Overnight, strikes targeted the southern suburbs of Beirut, according to a security source. A Reuters journalist observed a bright flash followed by a series of loud explosions shortly after the Israeli military issued warnings for residents to evacuate areas near buildings identified as housing Hezbollah infrastructure south of the capital.

In the last 24 hours, Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon, the eastern Bekaa Valley, and Beirut have resulted in at least 95 fatalities and 172 injuries, according to Lebanon’s health ministry early Tuesday.

Hezbollah’s deputy leader, Naim Qassem, delivered his first public address since Nasrallah’s death on Monday, asserting that “the resistance forces are prepared for ground engagement.” He noted that Hezbollah has continued to launch rockets into Israeli territory, reaching distances of up to 150 km (93 miles).

“We understand that this battle may be prolonged. We will emerge victorious as we did in the liberation of 2006,” he stated, referencing the last major conflict between the two adversaries.

Late Monday, Lebanese troops reportedly withdrew approximately five kilometers (3 miles) from their positions along the southern border with Israel, as per a Lebanese security source. A spokesperson for the Lebanese army did not confirm or deny this movement.

Historically, Lebanon’s army has maintained a neutral stance during major conflicts with Israel and has refrained from engaging the Israeli military in the past year of hostilities.

The White House and the U.S. State Department have not yet responded to inquiries regarding Israel’s ground operations in Lebanon. However, on Monday, U.S. President Joe Biden called for a ceasefire.

I have greater concerns than you may realize, and I support their decision to halt operations,” Biden stated to reporters when questioned about his stance on Israeli plans for a cross-border operation. “A ceasefire is necessary at this moment.”

Last week, Israel dismissed a proposal from the U.S. and France that advocated for a 21-day ceasefire along the Lebanon border, aimed at facilitating a diplomatic resolution that would enable displaced civilians from both sides to return to their homes.

Netanyahu asserts that no area in the region is beyond Israel’s reach as a ground invasion appears imminent

0
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Israel issued a warning to Iran on Monday, asserting that no location in the Middle East is beyond its capabilities and suggesting a potential ground invasion of Lebanon following the assassination of the Hezbollah leader, a key adversary backed by Tehran, in a Beirut suburb last week.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated in a three-minute video message directed at the Iranian populace, “There is no place we will not reach to safeguard our citizens and defend our nation.”

The assassination of Nasrallah on Friday, a significant figure in Tehran’s “Axis of Resistance” against Israeli and U.S. interests in the region, represents one of the most substantial setbacks for both Hezbollah and Iran in recent decades. Following two weeks of extensive airstrikes and a series of targeted killings of Hezbollah leaders, Israel, which has been preparing its forces for a possible ground operation, has indicated that a land invasion of Lebanon remains a viable option.

During a visit to troops stationed along Israel’s northern border, Defence Minister Yoav Gallant emphasized Israel’s commitment to ensuring the safe return of citizens who have sought refuge from Hezbollah rocket attacks amid nearly a year of ongoing border conflict.

“We will utilize all necessary resources—your forces, additional forces, from the air, sea, and land. Wishing you success,” Gallant stated after receiving updates from military commanders.

He noted that while the removal of Nasrallah is a significant objective, it is not the ultimate goal. “To guarantee the return of communities in northern Israel, we will leverage all our capabilities, including your involvement,” he added.

According to an unnamed U.S. official cited by The Washington Post, Israel has informed the U.S. of its intention to initiate a ground operation that could commence soon. This operation is expected to be smaller in scale than Israel’s 2006 conflict with Hezbollah, focusing primarily on the security of border communities.

In response to inquiries about these developments, U.S. President Joe Biden, who has faced challenges in persuading Israel to moderate its military actions, advocated for a ceasefire, stating, “I support them stopping.” The Pentagon directed reporters to Israel for further information regarding any potential land offensive.

Hezbollah prepared to counter ground invasion

Hezbollah’s deputy leader, Naim Qassem, delivered his first public address following the Israeli airstrikes that resulted in the death of Nasrallah last week. He asserted that his fighters are fully prepared to counter any ground invasion and disrupt its objectives. “The resistance forces are ready for a ground engagement,” he stated from an undisclosed location.

As he spoke, Israeli airstrikes continued in Beirut and other regions of Lebanon, prolonging a campaign that has lasted two weeks. This offensive has reportedly led to the deaths of several Hezbollah commanders, approximately 1,000 civilians, and has displaced one million people, according to the Lebanese government. The health ministry reported that the death toll from an Israeli strike on Ain Deleb, a town in southern Lebanon, has risen to 45, with rescuers working amidst the rubble of a collapsed building. “We are rescuing these people, pulling out the living, the torn apart, and the martyrs,” remarked rescuer Mazin al-Khatib.

The assassination of Nasrallah, along with targeted attacks on the group’s communication systems, represents a significant setback for the Shi’ite movement since its establishment by Iran in 1982 to combat Israel. Nasrallah transformed Hezbollah into Lebanon’s most formidable military and political entity, with influence extending throughout the Middle East. The organization now faces the challenge of finding a successor to a leader who was revered by millions for his defiance against Israel, despite being labeled a terrorist by the West.

Qassem indicated that Hezbollah would “choose a secretary-general for the party at the earliest opportunity … and fill the leadership and positions on a permanent basis.” He also noted that Hezbollah has continued to launch rockets into Israeli territory, reaching distances of up to 150 km (93 miles). “What we are doing is the bare minimum … We understand that the battle may be prolonged,” he stated. “We will emerge victorious as we did in the liberation of 2006,” he added, referencing the last major conflict between the two adversaries.

broader conflict

Hours prior to Qassem’s remarks, Hamas reported that an Israeli airstrike had resulted in the deaths of its leader in Lebanon, Fateh Sherif Abu el-Amin, along with his wife, son, and daughter in Tyre on Monday. Additionally, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine announced that three of its leaders were killed in a strike in the Kola district of Beirut, marking the first attack so close to the city center.

The Israeli strikes targeting militant positions in Lebanon are part of a broader conflict that extends from the Palestinian territories of Gaza and the occupied West Bank to Iranian-backed factions in Yemen and Iraq. This escalation has heightened concerns that the United States and Iran could become embroiled in the conflict.

Recent developments suggest that Israel remains committed to its military operations, showing no signs of restraint even after the elimination of Nasrallah. Prime Minister Netanyahu accused the Iranian government of exacerbating the situation in the Middle East, claiming it was leading its own people “closer to the abyss.”

In response, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani stated that Tehran would not allow Israel’s “criminal acts” to go unanswered, referencing the killings of Nasrallah and Brigadier General Abbas Nilforoushan, a deputy commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, who also perished in the strikes.

Despite the heavy civilian casualties, the United States, Israel’s closest ally, has maintained its support. Meanwhile, while Arab nations have condemned Israel’s actions, none have taken significant measures to pressure it to curb its military operations, which has frustrated residents in Beirut like Abou Imad. He expressed his discontent, stating, “You are watching as they (Israel) take over all the Arab countries and take us all. This indifference is shameful, for the Lebanese and Palestinian people.”

Jens Stoltenberg asserts that military aid to Ukraine must persist despite concerns about Putin’s threats

0

NATO allies should not be discouraged from increasing military support to Ukraine due to Vladimir Putin‘s “irresponsible nuclear rhetoric,” stated outgoing NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in an interview with Reuters on Monday.

Stoltenberg’s comments followed Putin’s recent assertion that Russia might resort to nuclear weapons if faced with conventional missile strikes, and that any attack on Russia backed by a nuclear power would be viewed as a collective assault.

This warning from Putin coincides with discussions among the United States and its allies regarding the possibility of allowing Ukraine to launch conventional Western missiles into Russian territory. Ukraine has expressed a desire for authorization to target elements of Russia’s military operations.

Stoltenberg remarked, “What we have observed is a consistent pattern of reckless Russian nuclear rhetoric and messaging, and this aligns with that trend.” He is set to pass the NATO leadership to former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte on Tuesday after a decade in his role.

no options without risk

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg stated, “Each time we have enhanced our support with new weaponry—be it battle tanks, long-range artillery, or F-16s—the Russians have attempted to thwart our efforts,” during an interview with Reuters at NATO’s headquarters near Brussels. He emphasized that these attempts have not been successful and that the latest developments should not deter NATO allies from continuing their support for Ukraine.

Stoltenberg noted that NATO has not observed any alterations in Russia’s nuclear stance that would necessitate a response from the alliance. As a former prime minister of Norway, he highlighted that the most significant threat to NATO would arise if President Putin were to achieve victory in Ukraine. “Such an outcome would signal that military aggression and threats against NATO allies yield results, ultimately making us all more vulnerable,” he remarked.

He also pointed out, “In warfare, there are no options without risk.” Meanwhile, the U.S. administration has shown hesitance in granting Ukraine the authority to launch strikes deep within Russian territory using long-range ATACMS missiles, citing concerns over escalating tensions with Moscow and the possibility of retaliation.

Some Western officials have raised doubts about the potential effectiveness of such strikes in altering the dynamics of the conflict. Stoltenberg remarked that there is “no silver bullet” capable of transforming the situation on the battlefield. However, he noted that significant strikes within Russia could contribute positively to the overall Western initiative aimed at assisting Ukraine in resisting Russia’s invasion.

He further emphasized that any negotiated resolution to the conflict must include security assurances for Ukraine from Western nations, particularly the United States. Without these guarantees, he warned, Russia would likely disregard any agreed-upon boundaries.

“When a line is established—whether it be the internationally recognized border or another ceasefire line—we must ensure that the conflict concludes there,” he stated. He pointed out that Russia has a history of attacking, pausing, and then resuming hostilities, referencing past agreements intended to resolve the ongoing conflict that began in 2014.

“I don’t believe we can alter President Putin’s perspective on Ukraine, but we can influence his decision-making by making it clear that the costs of continuing the war are so substantial that it would be more advantageous for him to recognize Ukraine as a sovereign and independent state.”

Lithuania has formally requested ICC to investigate Belarus for alleged crimes against humanity

0
The leader of the Belarusian democracy movement, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya speaks on the day she receives the 'European of the Year' prize at the National Museum of Denmark in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Lithuania has formally requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate Belarus for alleged crimes against humanity attributed to the authoritarian regime of Alexander Lukashenko. The Lithuanian Ministry of Justice stated that it is seeking an inquiry into the actions of Lukashenko’s government, which include forced deportations, persecution of individuals, and other inhumane acts that violate fundamental principles of international law.

The office of Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994 and maintains a close relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin, has not yet responded to the inquiry.

This initiative has garnered immediate backing from Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, the exiled leader of the Belarusian opposition, who resides in Lithuania. The Lithuanian government recognizes her as the legitimate leader of Belarus, rather than Lukashenko.

Tsikhanouskaya remarked, “The atrocities committed by this regime, including forced deportations, unlawful detentions, and torture, must not go unpunished. Lithuania’s bold stance inspires hope that the international community is beginning to hold the regime accountable for its crimes.”

Approximately 300,000 Belarusians have reportedly been compelled to leave their homeland, resulting in one out of every thirty residents of Belarus now living in exile. Tsikhanouskaya, who opposed Lukashenko in the August 2020 presidential election, fled the country following his declaration as the winner—a result widely criticized by both the opposition and Western nations as fraudulent. This election sparked widespread protests, which were met with severe repression by Lukashenko’s security forces, leading to thousands of arrests and many individuals seeking refuge abroad, particularly in Lithuania.

Although Belarus is not a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC), a member state can initiate a case at the ICC concerning alleged crimes partially occurring on its territory. A statement from Lithuania indicated that hundreds of thousands of Belarusians have sought humanitarian asylum in Lithuania and other European Union countries, with over 60,000 now residing permanently in Lithuania, many of whom have faced or continue to face pressure from the regime and its actions.

The statement emphasized that the forced deportation of individuals directly impacts Lithuania’s security interests, necessitating its engagement with the court. The ICC has not yet confirmed the receipt of a referral from Lithuania. Since the onset of the Ukraine war in February 2022, which Russia initiated partly from Belarusian territory, the ICC has issued arrest warrants for Putin, his chief of staff, the former defense minister, and the children’s commissioner. Russia has dismissed these actions as legally insignificant, given its non-participation in the ICC’s statute, and it is anticipated that Belarus may present a similar argument.

Lithuanian Justice Minister Ewa Dobrowolska remarked regarding Lukashenko, stating, “Putin is not the only one who should face justice at the court in The Hague. All his accomplices, who contribute to international crimes in Ukraine and beyond, must also be held accountable.”

Hezbollah is ready to confront any potential Israeli ground invasion in Lebanon

0
A man walks on the rubble of damaged buildings in the aftermath of Israeli air strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon

Hezbollah fighters are prepared to respond to any potential Israeli ground invasion of Lebanon, stated the group’s deputy leader, Naim Qassem, during his first public address since the recent Israeli airstrikes that resulted in the death of their long-time leader, Hassan Nasrallah. Qassem asserted that Israel will not succeed in its objectives.

“We are ready to confront any scenario, and if the Israelis opt for a land incursion, our resistance forces are fully prepared for ground combat,” he declared from an undisclosed location.

His remarks came as Israeli airstrikes continued to target locations in Beirut and other areas of Lebanon, marking a two-week escalation of attacks that have reportedly resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,000 Lebanese and displaced one million people, according to the Lebanese government.

The death of Nasrallah, along with significant losses to the organization’s communication infrastructure and the assassination of other high-ranking officials, represents a severe setback for Hezbollah since its establishment by Iran in 1982 to combat Israel. Under Nasrallah’s leadership, Hezbollah evolved into Lebanon’s most formidable military and political entity, exerting considerable influence throughout the Middle East.

Now, Hezbollah faces the daunting task of finding a successor to a charismatic leader who was revered by millions for his defiance against Israel, despite being labeled a terrorist by the West.

“We will appoint a new secretary-general for the party as soon as possible… and we will ensure that leadership roles are filled on a permanent basis,” Qassem confirmed.

Qassem stated that Hezbollah’s fighters have persistently launched rockets reaching up to 150 km (93 miles) into Israeli territory and are prepared to confront any potential ground invasion by Israel. “What we are doing is the bare minimum… We understand that this battle may be prolonged,” he remarked. “We will achieve victory as we did during the liberation of 2006 against the Israeli adversary,” he continued, referencing the last significant conflict between the two sides.

In response, Israel, which has also targeted leaders of the Palestinian militant group Hamas during the Gaza conflict, asserts that it will take all necessary measures to ensure the safe return of its citizens to evacuated areas along its northern border. A ground invasion has not been ruled out, and Israeli forces have been preparing for such an operation.

“The removal of Nasrallah is a crucial step, but it is not the final objective. To guarantee the return of Israel’s northern communities, we will utilize all our resources, and this includes you,” Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant informed troops stationed at the northern border.

Other militants hit

Hours prior to Qassem’s remarks from Hezbollah, Hamas reported that an Israeli airstrike resulted in the death of its leader in Lebanon, Fateh Sherif Abu el-Amin, along with his wife, son, and daughter in the southern city of Tyre on Monday.

Additionally, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine announced that three of its leaders were killed in a strike in the Kola district of Beirut, marking the first such incident within the city’s boundaries.

The recent surge of Israeli assaults on militant positions in Lebanon is part of a broader conflict that extends from the Palestinian territories of Gaza and the occupied West Bank to Yemen, Iraq, and within Israel itself. This escalation has heightened concerns that the United States and Iran may become embroiled in the conflict.

Destabilization across the region

Recent developments suggest that Israel remains committed to its military offensive, even following the elimination of Nasrallah, a key ally of Iran in the “Axis of Resistance” opposing Israeli and U.S. influence in the region.

Nasser Kanaani, spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, asserted that Tehran would respond decisively to what it termed Israel’s “criminal acts.” This statement was made in light of the recent killings of Nasrallah and Brigadier General Abbas Nilforoushan, a deputy commander of the Iranian Guard, who also perished in the same attacks on Friday.

Russia has indicated that Nasrallah’s death has resulted in significant destabilization across the region.

A representative for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated that the UK is advocating for a ceasefire, while simultaneously reaffirming its “ironclad” support for Israel’s right to defend itself.

The United States, a close ally of Israel, has consistently backed the nation despite rising concerns regarding substantial civilian casualties.

While Arab nations have publicly condemned Israel’s actions, none have taken tangible measures to compel Israel to limit its military operations, which has frustrated residents in Beirut, such as Abou Imad.

“You can see them (Israel) taking control over all the Arab nations and subjugating us. This apathy is disgraceful for both the Lebanese and Palestinian people,” he expressed.

Ambitious plans to alter the power structure in the Middle East and unforeseen consequences

0
A man walks on the rubble of damaged buildings in the aftermath of Israeli air strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated on Saturday that the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah represents a significant shift in the regional power dynamics that could last for years.

Netanyahu perceives this moment as a chance to fundamentally alter the power structure in the Middle East, believing that Hezbollah has been severely weakened. However, achieving total victory remains a challenge, and those who attain their goals may find themselves facing unforeseen consequences.

Since September 17, Israel has inflicted a series of devastating blows on the Iran-backed militant group in Lebanon, beginning with the destruction of communication devices, followed by a large-scale airstrike in southern Beirut that resulted in the death of senior commander Ibrahim Aqil and numerous civilians. This was succeeded by an intense bombing campaign that escalated over the following days. By Friday evening, when Nasrallah was killed in a bombing that destroyed several buildings, Hezbollah’s top leadership had been nearly eradicated.

Recent history provides harsh lessons for Israeli leaders and others who harbor ambitious plans for significant changes in Lebanon and the broader Middle East.

In June 1982, Israel launched an invasion of Lebanon aimed at dismantling the Palestinian Liberation Organization. Additionally, it sought to create a pliable Christian-led government in Beirut and to expel Syrian forces from the nation.

The outcome was a failure on all fronts. While Palestinian armed factions were indeed forced to leave Lebanon through an American-mediated agreement that relocated them to Tunisia, Yemen, and other locations, the objective of suppressing Palestinian national aspirations alongside the PLO was not achieved. Just five years later, the First Palestinian Intifada erupted in Gaza and spread to the West Bank. Today, Palestinians remain as resolute and restless as ever in their opposition to Israeli occupation.

Bashir Al-Gemayel, a Maronite Christian militia leader and Israel’s primary ally in Lebanon during the invasion, was elected by parliament but was assassinated in a large explosion in east Beirut before he could assume office. His brother, Amin, succeeded him, and under his leadership, with substantial American support, Lebanon and Israel reached an agreement in May 1983 to establish normal bilateral relations. However, the government faced fierce opposition and collapsed the following February, leading to the agreement’s cancellation.

Following the September 1982 Sabra-Shatila massacres, the United States deployed troops to Beirut but withdrew after its embassy was bombed twice, along with attacks on US Marines and French military barracks in October 1983.

The Lebanese civil war reignited and continued for over six years.

Syrian forces, which had entered Lebanon in 1976 as a “deterrence force” under an Arab League mandate, remained until 2005, following the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Al-Hariri.

One of the most significant consequences of the 1982 Israeli invasion was the emergence of Hezbollah, which engaged in a persistent guerrilla campaign that ultimately forced Israel to withdraw unilaterally from southern Lebanon. This marked the first and only instance of an Arab military force successfully compelling Israel to retreat from Arab territory. With support from Iran, Hezbollah proved to be far more formidable and effective than the Palestinian militants that Israel had previously expelled.

Hezbollah subsequently fought Israel to a stalemate in the 2006 war and continued to strengthen in the years that followed, bolstered by significant Iranian assistance.

Hezbollah currently finds itself weakened and disorganized, with evident infiltration by Israeli intelligence; however, it would be hasty to declare its end.

The 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked arrogance. As the Iraqi military disintegrated and American forces advanced toward Baghdad, the George W. Bush administration harbored illusions that Saddam Hussein’s downfall would trigger the collapse of governments in Tehran and Damascus, leading to a surge of liberal democracies throughout the region.

In reality, the US occupation of Iraq spiraled into a horrific cycle of sectarian violence, costing the US dearly in both lives and resources, while the Iraqi populace suffered even more. The execution of Saddam Hussein enabled Iran to extend its influence deep into Baghdad’s political landscape. Meanwhile, Al-Qaeda, which had been weakened by the US invasion of Afghanistan, found new life in Iraq’s Sunni regions, eventually evolving into the Islamic State in both Syria and Iraq.

As I observe the smoke rising from Beirut’s damaged southern suburbs, I am reminded of Condoleezza Rice’s remarks during the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah conflict, when she described the chaos and devastation as “the birth pangs of the new Middle East.”

Be cautious of those who herald a new beginning, the emergence of a new Middle East, or a redefined balance of power in the region. Lebanon exemplifies the potential pitfalls; it is a testament to the perils of unintended consequences.

Biden authorized $567 million in defense assistance for Taiwan

0
President Joe Biden speaks during the United Nations General Assembly

U.S. President Joe Biden authorized $567 million in defense assistance for Taiwan on Sunday, according to the White House. This decision represents the latest effort by the United States to enhance the island’s military capabilities amid escalating tensions with China.

Despite lacking formal diplomatic relations, the United States remains Taiwan’s primary international supporter and arms supplier. China has consistently urged Washington to cease its arms sales to Taipei, which it considers part of its territory.

The White House announced that Biden has granted the Secretary of State the authority to oversee the allocation of up to $567 million in defense materials and services from the Department of Defense, along with military education and training to assist Taiwan.

No additional details were provided. In April, Biden enacted a significant bill that allocates billions in new U.S. aid to Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, as well as support for Israel and Taiwan.

Taipei has expressed concerns regarding the postponement of U.S. arms shipments, particularly those involving upgraded F-14 fighter jets. Over the last five years, China has intensified its military and political pressure on Taiwan, which it considers a part of its territory, a stance that Taipei firmly opposes.

US shifts strategy on Haiti peacekeeping efforts in response to opposition from China and Russia

0
Kenyan police forces patrol a neighbourhood in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

The United States has abandoned its initiative for the U.N. Security Council to request a plan to convert a security mission aimed at combating armed gangs in Haiti into a formal U.N. peacekeeping operation. Some diplomats suggested this decision was made to placate Russia and China.

However, a senior official from the U.S. administration countered this interpretation, stating that the shift in strategy was in response to a recent appeal from Edgard Leblanc, the head of Haiti’s transition council, for a U.N. peacekeeping mission.

“It is not a matter of yielding to those who may not prioritize the welfare of the Haitian people,” the official, who requested anonymity, explained. “We are strategically navigating this situation and capitalizing on the momentum expressed by the Haitian president.”

The 15-member Security Council is scheduled to vote on Monday regarding a draft resolution to extend the mandate of the Multinational Security Support (MSS) mission until October 2, 2025. The U.N. initially approved this mission a year ago at the request of the Caribbean nation for assistance.

Diplomats indicate that Russia and China opposed the council’s request for a plan to transition the U.N.-backed security force into a formal U.N. peacekeeping mission, leading the U.S. to eliminate that language from the draft resolution, as reported by Reuters. Deputy Russian U.N. Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy stated on Sunday that Russia prefers to give the security force additional time to establish itself, emphasizing, “We don’t want to prejudge the outcome of the MSS. It is too early to draw conclusions.”

During the United Nations General Assembly last week, Haitian leaders expressed concerns about escalating insecurity in the country, despite the partial deployment of the security force. Powerful gangs, armed with weapons primarily trafficked from the United States, have formed a coalition in the capital, gaining control over most of the city and extending their influence to surrounding areas.

On Thursday, Leblanc addressed the U.N. General Assembly, asserting, “I am convinced that this change of status, while acknowledging that past mistakes must not be repeated, would ensure the complete success of the mission in Haiti.”

A senior U.S. official indicated that Washington plans to collaborate with partners in the upcoming weeks to address this issue. During a recent visit to Haiti, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken discussed the possibility of converting the security force into a U.N. peacekeeping mission.

Many Haitians express concerns regarding a U.N. armed presence, recalling past missions that resulted in a severe cholera outbreak and incidents of sexual abuse.

The current international security mission, led by Kenya and authorized by the U.N. Security Council, does not operate under U.N. auspices; instead, it relies on voluntary contributions of funds and personnel from various countries.

Progress has been limited in restoring order in Haiti, with only 400 Kenyan police officers deployed and a significant funding gap.

Earlier this month, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stated that deploying a U.N. peacekeeping force may not be the most effective solution for Haiti, which is grappling with a humanitarian crisis characterized by mass displacements, sexual violence, and widespread hunger.

According to U.N. estimates, gang violence has led to the displacement of over 700,000 individuals in Haiti.

Three Palestinian leaders killed in Israel strike in Beirut

0

A Palestinian militant organization announced on Monday that an Israeli airstrike in Beirut resulted in the deaths of three of its leaders, marking the first such attack within the city as Israel intensified its military actions against Iran‘s regional allies. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) reported that the strike specifically targeted the Kola district of Beirut.

According to witnesses cited by Reuters, the attack struck the upper levels of an apartment building in that area. There has been no immediate response from the Israeli military regarding the incident.

The rising number of Israeli assaults on the Hezbollah militia in Lebanon and the Houthi militia in Yemen has raised concerns that the conflict in the Middle East could escalate further, potentially involving Iran and the United States, Israel’s primary ally.

The PFLP is among the militant groups actively engaged in opposition to Israel. On Sunday, Israel conducted airstrikes against Houthi positions in Yemen and targeted numerous Hezbollah sites across Lebanon, following the earlier assassination of a Hezbollah leader.

The health ministry controlled by the Houthis reported that airstrikes on Yemen’s port city of Hodeidah resulted in the deaths of at least four individuals and left 29 others injured. Israel stated that these strikes were a reaction to missile attacks launched by the Houthis. In Lebanon, officials confirmed that Israeli airstrikes on Sunday claimed the lives of at least 105 people.

According to Lebanon’s Health Ministry, over 1,000 Lebanese have died and 6,000 have been injured in the last two weeks, although the number of civilian casualties has not been specified. The government indicated that approximately one million people, representing a fifth of the population, have been displaced from their homes.

The ongoing Israeli airstrikes over the past fortnight have resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking Hezbollah officials, including the group’s leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. Israel has pledged to continue its military operations, asserting that its goal is to restore security to northern regions for residents who have been compelled to evacuate due to Hezbollah’s rocket fire.

On Sunday, Israeli drones were observed flying over Beirut, accompanied by the sounds of new airstrikes resonating throughout the Lebanese capital. Displaced families sought refuge for the night on benches at Zaitunay Bay, a popular area filled with restaurants and cafes along Beirut’s waterfront.

Numerous attacks by Israel have predominantly occurred in southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah, supported by Iran, conducts most of its activities, as well as in the southern suburbs of Beirut. The recent strike in the Kola district marks what seems to be the first assault within the boundaries of Beirut itself.

Local residents reported that Syrians who had fled the Israeli airstrikes were sleeping under a bridge in the area for several days. The United States has called for a diplomatic solution to the ongoing conflict in Lebanon while simultaneously authorizing an increase in military presence in the region.

When asked about the possibility of avoiding a full-scale war in the Middle East, U.S. President Joe Biden stated, “It has to be,” indicating his intention to discuss the situation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

US boosts air support and troop readiness for deployment in the Middle East

0
US service members

The U.S. military announced on Sunday that it is enhancing its air support capabilities in the Middle East and placing troops on a heightened state of readiness for potential deployment to the area, as it issued a warning to Iran regarding the escalation of the ongoing conflict.

This decision follows President Joe Biden‘s directive to the Pentagon to modify U.S. military positioning in the region, driven by growing concerns that Israel‘s recent elimination of the leader of Iran-supported Hezbollah could provoke a response from Tehran.

Pentagon spokesperson Major General Patrick Ryder emphasized the U.S. commitment to preventing Iran and its allied groups from taking advantage of the current situation or escalating the conflict.

He further warned that should Iran or its affiliated groups attempt to target American personnel or interests in the region, the United States would take all necessary actions to protect its citizens.

The Pentagon’s statement provided limited information regarding the extent of the new air deployment, indicating only that “we will further reinforce our defensive air-support capabilities in the coming days.”

On Sunday, Israel intensified its military actions in Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah following the elimination of the group’s leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, along with several other high-ranking commanders as part of an escalating offensive.

These strikes have significantly weakened Hezbollah, marking a series of devastating losses for the group after nearly a year of cross-border hostilities, which have exposed significant security vulnerabilities. However, this situation has raised concerns about the U.S. government’s stated objectives of containing the conflict and ensuring the safety of American personnel across the Middle East.

John Kirby, the White House national security spokesperson, noted on Sunday that the United States is closely monitoring Hezbollah’s attempts to address its leadership void and is in ongoing discussions with Israeli officials regarding appropriate next steps.

While the U.S. State Department has not yet mandated an evacuation from Lebanon, last week, U.S. officials informed Reuters that the Pentagon was deploying a small number of additional troops to Cyprus to assist in preparations for potential scenarios, including the evacuation of American citizens from Lebanon.

The Pentagon confirmed that U.S. forces are being positioned for possible deployment if necessary. “Secretary Austin has increased the readiness of additional U.S. forces to deploy, enhancing our preparedness to respond to various contingencies,” Ryder stated.

The Israeli military has launched airstrikes on Ras Isa and Hodeidah in Yemen

0

The Israeli military has announced that its fighter jets conducted airstrikes on Houthi positions in Yemen.

In a statement released on Sunday, the military confirmed that the strikes were aimed at Ras Isa and Hodeidah.

This operation followed a declaration from the Houthis, who claimed to have launched a ballistic missile targeting Ben Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv.

The Houthi rebel group, which governs a significant portion of northern Yemen, has consistently targeted Israel and Israeli-affiliated vessels in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Bab al-Mandeb Strait since November of last year, framing these actions as a show of support for Palestinians facing attacks in the Gaza Strip.

US says all-out war not the way to return people to homes in northern Israel

0

Israel cannot ensure the safe return of residents to their homes in the northern region by engaging in a full-scale conflict with Hezbollah or Iran, stated John Kirby, the White House national security spokesperson, on Sunday.

On the same day, Israel targeted additional sites in Lebanon, intensifying its offensive against Hezbollah following the death of the group’s leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. Israel aims to secure its northern territories from Hezbollah’s rocket attacks and facilitate the return of thousands of displaced individuals.

Kirby emphasized to CNN, “Engaging in an all-out war with Hezbollah, especially with Iran, is not the solution. To ensure the safe and sustainable return of those individuals, we believe pursuing a diplomatic approach is essential.” The United States, a longstanding ally and primary arms supplier to Israel, is closely monitoring Hezbollah’s response to the leadership change and is in ongoing discussions with Israeli officials regarding the appropriate next steps.

Lebanon’s Health Ministry reports that over 1,000 Lebanese individuals have lost their lives and approximately 6,000 have been injured in the last two weeks. The government has indicated that around one million people, which constitutes one-fifth of the population, have been displaced from their homes.

Kirby stated, “We have been clear that our perspective on tactical execution regarding civilian protection may differ from theirs,” while emphasizing that U.S. support for Israel’s security remains unwavering.

On Saturday, Iran announced its intention to safeguard its national and security interests, although it did not provide specific details. The country has requested a meeting of the United Nations Security Council to address Israel’s actions.

Kirby remarked, “We have noted the statements emerging from Tehran and will monitor their subsequent actions.”

Israel had real-time intelligence on Nasrallah’s meeting, military said

0
Boys scouts carry a picture of Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah

Israel executed a lethal strike against Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah after receiving intelligence about his meeting with senior commanders at the movement’s underground headquarters in southern Beirut, according to the Israeli military on Saturday.

This operation followed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York, where he stated that Israel would not tolerate Hezbollah’s presence along its borders. The strike came in the wake of the recent assassinations of several high-ranking members of the group.

Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani, an Israeli military spokesperson, indicated that the operation, dubbed “New Order,” took place on Friday while Nasrallah and the Hezbollah leadership were convening to strategize further assaults against Israel. “We had real-time intelligence and an operational opportunity that enabled us to execute this attack,” he informed reporters. Additionally, Israel’s Army Radio reported that the commander of the air force squadron involved in the operation mentioned that pilots received information about the target shortly before their departure.

The officer, referred to only as Lieutenant Colonel M., stated, “The pilots were unaware of the target during the planning phase of the strike.” He added, “We revealed the target to the teams just a few hours before the operation, and they grasped their objective.”

Shoshani refrained from commenting on rumors regarding the potential use of U.S.-manufactured Mark 84 heavy bombs. However, Brigadier General Amichai Levin, the commander of Hatzerim air base, informed reporters that numerous munitions struck the target in rapid succession.

Shoshani also mentioned that Ali Karaki, the leader of Hezbollah’s southern front, who was targeted by Israel earlier that week, was killed in the operation. Following the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7 of the previous year, Hezbollah confirmed Nasrallah’s death and declared its intention to persist in its fight against Israel “in support of Gaza and Palestine, and in defense of Lebanon.”

Since that time, both sides have engaged in daily exchanges of missile and rocket fire, resulting in the evacuation of tens of thousands of individuals on both sides of the border and leaving large areas nearly deserted.

Recent weeks have seen a significant increase in tensions as Israel has initiated a targeted campaign against key members of Hezbollah’s military leadership, aiming to diminish the group’s operational capabilities. “Our intelligence efforts on Nasrallah have spanned several years. For decades, we have been collecting information, anticipating that he might attempt to provoke a conflict,” he stated. “With real-time intelligence at our disposal, we executed the strike.”

US airstrikes in Syria kill 37 terrorists linked to extremist groups

0

In Syria, the U.S. military reported on Sunday that two airstrikes resulted in the deaths of 37 militants associated with the extremist Islamic State group and an al-Qaeda-affiliated organization. Among the deceased were two high-ranking militants.

U.S. Central Command indicated that a strike occurred in northwestern Syria on Tuesday, targeting a senior member of the al-Qaeda-linked Hurras al-Deen group along with eight others, noting that he was responsible for managing military operations.

Additionally, they revealed details of a significant airstrike conducted on September 16, which targeted an IS training camp in a remote, undisclosed area of central Syria, resulting in the deaths of 28 militants, including at least four Syrian leaders.

The statement emphasized that the airstrike would hinder ISIS’s ability to carry out operations against U.S. interests and those of its allies and partners.

Currently, approximately 900 U.S. personnel are stationed in Syria, alongside an undisclosed number of contractors, primarily focused on preventing a resurgence of the extremist IS group, which gained control over vast territories in Iraq and Syria in 2014.

U.S. forces provide advisory and support roles to their primary allies in northeastern Syria, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, who are positioned near strategic locations where Iran-backed militant groups operate, including a crucial border crossing with Iraq.

Kremlin has announced that Russia’s updated nuclear doctrine is being formalized

0

The Kremlin announced on Sunday that revisions to Russia’s nuclear doctrine have been drafted and are set to be formalized, indicating that the documents outlining the conditions under which Moscow may deploy nuclear weapons will be revised.

 

On Wednesday, President Vladimir Putin cautioned the West that the proposed modifications to the doctrine would permit Russia to utilize nuclear arms in response to conventional missile strikes and would interpret any attack on Russia, backed by a nuclear state, as a coordinated assault.

These adjustments are largely perceived as an effort by Putin to establish a “red line” for the United States and its allies, signaling that Moscow may resort to nuclear retaliation if Ukraine is allowed to launch deep strikes into Russian territory using long-range Western missiles.

 

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov informed state TV reporter Pavel Zarubin on Sunday: “The amendments have been prepared and will now be formalized.”

Peskov referenced the global context, highlighting the increasing tensions along Russia’s borders and the advancing presence of NATO infrastructure in the region. He also pointed to the heightened engagement of Western nuclear powers supporting Ukraine in the conflict as a key factor influencing the revisions to the doctrine.